The official climatology position is not an explanation; it's a fake number (3.7 watts per square meter) to represent heat trapped in the atmosphere. It is totally impossible to produce such a number, because the infinitely complex interactions in the atmosphere move toward equilibrium, with every molecule doing something indefinable and unpredictable. Climatologists cannot produce a consistent description of what the number is supposed to mean.
Trapping heat in the atmosphere is too ridiculous to be called science. Heat moves into and out of the atmosphere constantly. Temperatures vary 20 degrees or more between night and day. How could some of it get trapped and not the rest? It would be like trapping water in a river. The term “heat trapping gas” was contrived for propaganda purposes.
Physics has been producing endless errors since James Joule pretended to measure heat by stirring water in a wooden bucket in 1845 to determine the definition of kinetic energy. A single point of measurement will not determine the correct equation. Nothing about the result says what the result should be. Yet physicists pretend to be verifying and improving the precision of Joule's measurement ever since and using it as a constant in referencing energy.
A claimed measurement of gravity waves was totally contrived pretending to measure at millions and billions of times below the level of technological limits. The claimed distance measured is 100 million times smaller than the vibration of atoms. That's a noise to signal ratio of 100 million to one.
1. Science Contrived For Greenhouse Gases
2. Energy Misdefined in Physics
3. Fake Measurement of Gravity Waves
4. Why Hydrogen Fusion Produces No Energy
5. Relativity Has No Relationship To Science
How could all those scientists be wrong? They operate in the dark and say, just trust us, with no accountability.
The errors are ignored and promoted by power mongers.
Science Contrived For Greenhouse Gases
All life is on the verge of becoming extinct due to a shortage of carbon dioxide in the air, because oceans tie it up as calcium carbonate and limestone. Volcanoes used to replace it, but they died down as tectonic plates got too thick due to the continuous cool-down of the planet.
A temperature increase won't destroy all life, but a shortage of carbon dioxide will. There was five times as much CO2 in the air during dinosaur years and twenty times as much when modern photosynthesis began.
Not the least reason why that much carbon dioxide didn't destroy life is because there is no such thing as trapping heat in the atmosphere. Radiation is emitted constantly from all matter, and most easily from a transparent gas. Why don't conduction, convection and evaporation cause heat to get trapped in the atmosphere? That's how most heat gets into the atmosphere. Journalists don't know it; yet they impose their stupidity onto everyone.
Obviously, the air cools at night. Why would some of the heat be trapped while the rest cools?
There were some stupid scientists who used to claim that greenhouse gases are the only means for getting heat into the atmosphere. They stopped saying that recently, but journalists breezed on past them and never stopped with their idiocy and dogmatism which is approaching totalitarianism.
The official climatology position is not an explanation; it's fake mathematics that shows a number to represent heat trapped in the atmosphere, when there is no such thing as trapping heat in the atmosphere. The math is called Radiative Transfer Equations.
Mathematical Proof Energy is Misdefined in Physics
Physicists used this test in an improper manner starting with the false assumption that force times distance should be the starting point. A false definition of energy resulted stating that ½mv² is kinetic energy. Applying rocket energetics to the same test that physicists used proves that they were wrong and mv (momentum) is the real kinetic energy.
Explanation of Concept: Energy is defined as "that which is conserved during transformations." Conserved means totals stay the same when components are re-arranged. So the test for the definition of kinetic energy is to re-arrange the components and see which total stays the same.
Part 1: Kinetic energy is not ½mv²:
A 4kg object dropped 1m (meter) has the same amount of ½mv² as a 1kg object dropped 4m, because force times distance equals ½mv² for an accelerating mass. But a rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities requires twice as much energy as fuel for the large mass as for the small one.
Rocket burn time:
large mass: 1.77177876722800 seconds
small mass: 0.88588938361400 seconds
Therefore, both masses do not have the same energy; the rocket does not transform energy in proportion to ½mv²; ½mv² is not kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel does not produce a consistent amount of ½mv².
Part 2: Kinetic energy is mv:
A 4kg object dropped for 1s (second) has the same amount of mv (momentum) as a 1kg object dropped for 4s, because force times time equals mv for an accelerating mass. A rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities uses the same amount of energy as fuel for both masses.
Rocket burn time:
large mass: 3.92400000000000 seconds
small mass: 3.92400000000000 seconds
Therefore, both masses have the same amount of energy; the rocket transforms energy in proportion to mv; mv is kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel produces a consistent amount of mv.
All logic and evidence of energy point to the same conclusion. The logic created the need to derive the mathematical proof.
About ninety percent of physics is corrupted by the error... Read More
Gravity Waves Contrived with Fake Measurements
A recent claim of measuring gravity waves shows total fakery. Minute effects were said to be measured at levels of millions and billions of times below the capabilities of technology. A motion of 0.1 atto meters by a mirror was said to be measured by reflecting a laser beam off it. That distance is 2.87 billion times smaller than the distance between iron atoms in steel... Read More
Electric Energy Loses All But 14.4% Before Getting to the Vehicles.
An electric auto will convert 5-10% of the energy in natural gas into motion. A normal vehicle will convert 20-30% of the energy in gasoline into motion. That's 3 or 4 times more energy recovered with an internal combustion vehicle than an electric vehicle... Read More
To solve the problems of wars, economy and health care, it's necessary to start at the beginning. The beginning is the rationality of science.
How Social Fantasies Replace Science
False Energy Assumptions for Nuclear Fusion
Why "Hydrogen Bombs" are not Hydrogen Bombs
Why "Fossil Fuels" are not Fossil Fuels
Dark Matter and Space-Time Problem
A Counter-Argument to Relativity
Contradictions in Quantum Mechanics
ATP Theory is Absurd
These errors occur because physicists and biophysicists create the appearance of not knowing that chemical energy is in electrons. How could they not know. Some do, and they lie to gullible persons who don't know better. The combination of liars and gullible fools locks in errors everywhere including carbon dioxide, ATP synthesis and fossil fuels.
Today's temperature is 5.77λR2/dθ3T4,
becoming λR/755·T/γ3θ by tomorrow.
About the Author / Graduate Research