Energy Misdefined: Simple and unquestionable mathematical proof shows energy has been misdefined in physics. The definition of kinetic energy has velocity squared within it. (KE=½mv²) Nothing can move at velocity squared, as its motion is its velocity. Summary Description of Energy Misdefined
There is no energy in hydrogen fusion. Einstein created an expectation of huge amounts of energy in hydrogen fusion because of the equation, E=mc², while test keep finding none. Einstein paralleled a misdefinition of energy in squaring the velocity of light. Unsquare the velocity of light, and the energy reduces to irrelevance. It also means hydrogen bombs are only fission bombs. Wikipedia states, "most of its destructive energy comes from uranium fission rather than fusion." Why so little fusion in hydrogen bombs? Because there is no energy in fusion. A small amount could be lied about. Read More
Climatologists claim there is 79% radiation in the energy leaving the earth's surface. A white hot light bulb cannot emit that much radiation without a vacuum environment. Reduce it to the 1-3% that it should be and global warming reduces by a factor of 40. The claimed 0.7°C caused by humans becomes 0.018°C. This error occurred because an erroneous Stefan-Boltzmann constant shows 20-50 times too much radiation at normal temperatures.
If all 0.7°C heating said to be caused by humans went into the surface of the oceans to a depth of 100 meters, the ocean surface temperature increase would be 0.025°C, and none of the heating would be left in the air. It means hurricanes are not caused by global warming, nor is coral bleaching. Hurricane Math
A major error of global warming is not noticing that each carbon dioxide molecule is surrounded by 2,500 air molecules and has no way to spread the heat around. This dilution divides the CO2 temperature by 2,500 for the average temperature, which is no heating at all. Conducting heat to nearby molecules by bumping increases the number of molecules radiating away the added heat, which prevents very many molecules from picking up additional heat. The Common Sense Logic of Global Warming
Absorption of radiation by carbon dioxide reduces to irrelevance, because black body radiation is constantly emitted by all matter, and much more readily from the transparent gas of the atmosphere than from opaque solids. Emitting at broad band (black body) wavelengths is stronger than absorbing at the "fingerprint" wavelengths of carbon dioxide. When climatologists point to the visible dip in the absorption curve, they fail to notice that more radiation is emitted at other frequencies. This is the main problem nonscientists have. They assume absorption is everything, and they can't get to the rest of the subject.
Climatologists describe about 10% of the subject and use fake math to give it a large quantity. When the other 90% of the subject is included, it shows that the quantities are miniscule to a point of zero effect. The fake math starts with 79% radiation which should be 1-3% and then uses radiative transfer equations which contrive 1°C increase upon doubling CO2 in the air. Omitted is the high rate of radiation of energy out of the atmosphere which prevents accumulation of heat. If the heat cannot accumulate, it cannot spread to the other 2,500 molecules around each CO2 molecule, and the average increase in temperature is nothing. Then there is saturation which was disappeared in the radiative transfer equations and which otherwise shows that humans could not influence more than one part per thousand of whatever CO2 does, because CO2 is already absorbing all radiation available to it in 10 meters of distance travel, so adding more CO2 only shortens the distance without increasing the heat. Fake math cannot make saturation disappear.
The common sense of the subject is that a small amount of something cannot heat a large amount of something (without a nuclear reaction), because heat dissipates, always. Four hundred parts per million carbon dioxide in the air is never going to influence the temperature of the atmosphere for this reason.
How could all those scientists be wrong? They operate in the dark and say, just trust us, with no accountability.
The 33°C Error
The gravity wave tunnel error
Getting Greenhouse Wrong
Bureaucrats promote a fake efficiency of 96% for electric motors creating big expectations for electrifying the transportation system. Laws of physics do not allow more than 40% efficiency in converting any form of energy into the kinetic energy of motion. Read More
Mathematical Proof Energy is Misdefined in Physics
Physicists used this test in an improper manner starting with the false assumption that force times distance should be the starting point. A false definition of energy resulted stating that ½mv² is kinetic energy. Applying rocket energetics to the same test that physicists used proves that they were wrong and mv (momentum) is the real kinetic energy.
Explanation of Concept: Energy is defined as "that which is conserved during transformations." Conserved means totals stay the same when components are re-arranged. So the test for the definition of kinetic energy is to re-arrange the components and see which total stays the same.
Part 1: Kinetic energy is not ½mv²:
A 4kg object dropped 1m (meter) has the same amount of ½mv² as a 1kg object dropped 4m, because force times distance equals ½mv² for an accelerating mass. But a rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities requires twice as much energy as fuel for the large mass as for the small one.
Rocket burn time:
large mass: 1.77177876722800 seconds
small mass: 0.88588938361400 seconds
Therefore, both masses do not have the same energy; the rocket does not transform energy in proportion to ½mv²; ½mv² is not kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel does not produce a consistent amount of ½mv².
Part 2: Kinetic energy is mv:
A 4kg object dropped for 1s (second) has the same amount of mv (momentum) as a 1kg object dropped for 4s, because force times time equals mv for an accelerating mass. A rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities uses the same amount of energy as fuel for both masses.
Rocket burn time:
large mass: 3.92400000000000 seconds
small mass: 3.92400000000000 seconds
Therefore, both masses have the same amount of energy; the rocket transforms energy in proportion to mv; mv is kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel produces a consistent amount of mv.
All logic and evidence of energy point to the same conclusion. The logic created the need to derive the mathematical proof.
About ninety percent of physics is corrupted by the error... Read More
Gravity wave measurements were faked pretending to measure at millions and billions of times below the level of technological limits. The claimed distance measured is 0.1 atto meters, which is 100 million times smaller than the vibration of atoms. Nothing can be measured through a noise to signal ratio of 100 million to one.
False Energy Assumptions for Nuclear Fusion
Why "Hydrogen Bombs" are not Hydrogen Bombs
Why "Fossil Fuels" are not Fossil Fuels
Dark Matter and Space-Time Problem
A Counter-Argument to Relativity
Contradictions in Quantum Mechanics
ATP Theory is Absurd
Today's temperature is 5.77λR2/dθ3T4,
becoming λR/755·T/γ3θ by tomorrow.