Summary

Science drifted into fakery over the past few decades due to a lack of criticism, inside science and out. Real scientists are being silenced and shoved out, as incompetents conspire to take over science and use it for mongering power. This process began in physics three hundred years ago due to its mysterious nature, and now it is taking over the biological sciences also.

The standard of science is now, "just trust us," where the evidence is buried in a gnostic pit inaccessible to other scientists, let alone the public. Isn't it strange that this was the charlatanism which science was supposed to replace. It doesn't die easily, because it is the tool used by incompetents to overwhelm rationality in pushing their way into power. Charlatanism is back using science for a fake validly which could not have been dreamed of in the thirteenth century.

Shown here is mathematical proof that kinetic energy has been misdefined in physics. About 90% of physics is corrupted by the error. Einstein paralleled the erroneous definition of energy in his equation E=mc˛ creating a false expectation of huge amounts of energy in hydrogen fusion. Recent tests have been unable to produce significant energy from hydrogen fusion. Hydrogen bombs lack a fusion reaction for the same reason. They are fission bombs being represented as fusion bombs. A fission reaction is supposedly needed to start the fusion reaction, but it is the only result. Physicists lie about it, because they don't want to admit failure at producing a hydrogen bomb preferring to glamorize their wizardry by pretending to be successful.

Global warming science continued at the physics standard contriving an effect out of thin air, while saturation precludes global warming from greenhouse gases. Climatologists skipped over saturation and used modeling as their only significant methodology. Modeling, being totally arbitrary in construction, is nothing resembling a proper scientific method for producing the reliability that is expected in science. Garbage in; garbage out.

The public is not being told what is happening in science. Science news is presented as if science were a flawless model of perfection. No one explains science issues for the public, and no serious criticism is allowed inside science or out. Scientists who criticize global warming are being shoved out of science.

If science were the model of reliability that it is framed as, this book would be irrelevant bickering. What I show is irrefutable evidence that science is a criminal conspiracy. Truth is defined by its relationships to surrounding realities as shown through rationality, which is called logic. Measurement without correct logic is a fraud. For this reason, the book is not about me, it is about the public's right and need to know.

I prove through consistent logic with all surrounding realities, which is the closest thing to proof there is. Frauds can never produce a consistent logic, so they never explain. There is no such thing as absolute proof. Proof is nothing more than accepting the obvious as fact. If someone will not accept the obvious as fact, no one can force them to. But no one can deny the truth when realities openly interact. Truth will always prevail and evolve forward through the open interaction of realities.

What I show is that whole fields of science are based upon fraud including physics, relativity, quantum mechanics, global warming, phylogenetics, paleontology and evolution. This occurred because science has been dragged down to the criminal level by power mongers who overwhelm real scientists.

—Physics, as indicated by the erroneous definition of kinetic energy, which I have mathematically proven in simple and unquestionable terms. About ninety percent of physics is corrupted by the error.

—Relativity, because it is based upon the velocity of light being determined by receiving points, which puts effect ahead of cause, and uses multiple reference frames to supposedly avoid multiple velocities, while there is no difference. It thereby does not conserve the energy of radiation.

—Quantum mechanics, because it bases radiant energy upon packets of energy called photons, while energy and radiation cannot have length, width and height, and the energy cannot avoid reduction with distance from the source, as photons supposedly do. The basis for photons is a misinterpretation/misrepresentation of the mechanism by which light enhances the energy of electrons by bumping them multiple times rather than dumping a one time package of energy onto them called a photon.

—Global warming, because there is no science to the subject, the climate being too complex and random, beyond a few measurements which show saturation to preclude the result. The avoidance of explanations on saturation or a real mechanism is criminal negligence.

—Phylogenetics, which is destroying traditional taxonomy, because it is contrived from trivial measurements of molecules which mislead instead of inform, as shown by getting the age of the morel mushroom off by 129 million years.

—Paleontology, as soil shaped the evolution of land plants and animals, while the claim is that soil was created by acids breaking down rocks through three roots and carbon dioxide. Clay is largely aluminum, while rocks seldom have significant aluminum. The soil was deposited by a planet exploding, which has recently been denied to have happened.

—Evolution, as the era of modern biology was created by the evolution of grass, which wiped out dinosaurs and allowed modern mammals and deciduous trees to evolve. Biologists see none of it and attribute the result to an asteroid.

Some critics have mentioned a few of these points but without the significant context of the forces which overwhelmed science creating the errors and preventing corrections from being made. The over-all perspective which I describe is necessary to explain what is happening and why.

Of course, most scientists don't have a clue that most of these errors exist. That's because sin and ignorance are inseparable. Sin creates ignorance; and ignorance creates sin. If the frauds knew what they were doing, the sin would end.

There is a level of assumptions where nothing is expected to be any better than it is. Those concerns are values. This subject is not about values. Politics is where values are taken up. Science is definable and has the purpose of being definable. This book says that science is producing fraud in place of its definitive responsibilities. Science is defined by the expectation of replacing ignorance and falsehood with reliable information. Only certain procedures do so. Evidence must be acquired in a verifiable and reproducible manner. That's not the standard that science is producing.