July 26, 2024

Corruption is not an opinion; it's a methodology. The methodology is lawlessness. But lawlessness is too abstract for corrupters to understand. They simply find laws to get in their way in promoting their motives. So they assume inferior persons produced laws in their attempt to get ahead through invalid methods. The inferior persons are assumed to be liberals, since it is liberals who try to use laws to prevent corruption from prevailing.

Corrupters assume, half consciously, that defying laws is the only acceptable way of getting anything done. Superficially, they tell themselves that they are the only proper protectors of laws, but only as a rationalization aligned upon being the only proper inheritors of existence.

While allowing no laws to be applied to themselves, corrupters create harassment requirements for opponents, such as conservatives requiring food stamp recipients to be looking for work, while the attack victims already either are working or can't be working or jobs are not available. When jobs are not available, conservatives do not want the victims to qualify for food stamps. But more basically, conservatives want to harass their victims into the ground by creating impossible requirements for them. The most important thing to notice about that subject is, why is it the business of the destroyers how their victims run their lives?

That gets to the point of what valid laws are, which is closely related to the mysterious concept of the how to conceptualize what lawlessness is. In the simplest terms, existence must be aligned upon the objective realities of the universe that define life and solutions to problems, which is rationality. Making that concept more meaningful is the challenge.

Humanly created laws can't be perfect; yet they are a necessity for ordered existence. That means human laws need to be aligned upon the most serious concerns; and then rationality must be added to complete the process of aligning upon the objective realities of existence.

Notice how Trump omits the second step of adding rationality to the application of laws. By stripping rationality from the subject, the humanly created laws don't exist. They require rationality to determine their meaning and application.

And yet Trump is the hero and champion for a large group of persons who are irreconcilably convinced that Trump is on their side in saving them from ordered existence. They are missing a lot in the area of ordered existence.

But what if their reaction is only symbolic in making a statement about the more important things being subverted through lawlessness and overwhelming everyone? There is that interpretation of the Trump phenomenon. If so, there needs to be something more to existence than self-destruction to make a statement; and Trump doesn't add that factor to his lawlessness. Of course, he pretends to do so in claiming to solve all problems through such insanity as 60% tariffs on Chinese imports as a method of eliminating taxes, while tariffs are taxes. It shows that leadership requires competence, not just rebellion against something.

Social and political realities are quite superficial, which means they do not have clear meaning. Each side produces a different interpretation of superficial realities. That's because more basic realities are needed to create meaning and more basic means more abstract. Abstract reality is more definitive; but it requires knowledge which tends to limit its prevalence.

Knowledge is required to properly align upon the objective realities of the universe. That means the deciders need to focus on knowledge; but the focus has been re-aligned upon being winners. Reagan said, if you need to explain, you are already a loser. He assumed being a winner is the purpose of life and rationality is for fools. Rationality requires explanation of claims.

Corrupters are trying to be winners, where rationality exposes them as losers. They turn to domination to prevail against other persons as their method of being winners without rationality. Domination is the basis of all corruption.

So of course corrupters are not going to get properly aligned upon objective reality while trying to be winners by replacing rationality with domination. That means one of the simplest facts about lawlessness is that fighting a war against rationality through domination is the most obvious example of lawlessness.

Yet the Reaganites instituted that standard as the "new normal" to replace the objective realities of the universe as the determining factor of what normal is.

Reagan also said, government is the problem. How can laws be produced without government? Only harassment demands by dominating totalitarians exist without laws properly determined through government. Yet Reaganites threw out critical laws as so-called deregulation, which resulted in such things as derivatives in banking which created the economic collapse of 2008.

It shows that the difference between lawlessness and proper use of laws is not a small difference. And yet, corrupters assume lawlessness is a superior standard, because it is required to convert incompetent losers into winners.

That sequence of assumptions shows that corrupters are oriented around a very short immediate in producing results that are destructive in total effects. Corrupters are so absorbed in immediate gains that they are cut off from the destructiveness of defying the objective realities that define life and solutions to problems.