October 4, 2020

Conservatives waste our time with trivia to a point of being irrelevant. They have no choice about it. Even if their enemies (liberals) were the horrendous criminals that conservatives pretend, nitpicking is still the only option conservatives have, because getting real would condemn themselves vastly more than their enemies.

An example is Trump and a few other conservatives relentlessly attacking Biden's kids. Biden's kids are not in politics; therefore, it is no business of Trump's what they are doing. Even if they are criminals, it's no business of Trump's. There are millions of criminals out there. It's not appropriate for presidents to do anything about them on an individual basis which requires specialists. Of course, Trump doesn't care what appropriate is for presidents.

Search high and low over the past four years of media, or the past four decades, and there is no conservative criticism of liberals that would be the slightest relevance to rational persons if it were true. It's nothing but attempts to synthesize relevance out of irrelevance.

This is not the least reason why conservative nobodies are all wrapped up in conspiracy theories such as QAnon. They don't have anything else to focus on. They can't find real issues to take up while opposing enemies, because nothing significant can enter the conservative domain without condemning conservatives more than their enemies.

Corrupters in general do not tolerate moral criticism on any subject, because they don't want morality to be relevant. They want to pretend an amoral state into existence, where corruption is virtue when exploitable. Winning is a test which defies morality.

Monumental claims can be made when too ridiculous to be relevant, such as keeping out immigrants because they are criminals. Attacks upon immigrants have serious consequences, but the reasons given for rationalizing are too far removed from truth to function as realities; they are forces only.

What it adds up to is anything but disconnecting from conservative gibberish is to get one's head filled with garbage. It's not a conflict of realities, because there are no significant realities that conservatives promote.

Being under such constraints, conservatives try to balloon the nitpicking into significance by pretending that it indicates character flaws. A character flaw might be expressed in other ways not mentioned giving it heightened significance. If corrupters can't mention it, it's not real or relevant.

All realities that corrupters produce are that way. The realities flowing from corrupters must project into an invisible realm which only corrupters are familiar with. Corrupt realities must be kept out of the visible world, where they would never stand up to evaluation. So we are supposed to argue against (and design our lives around) invisible realities under the control of corrupters only.

Nitpicking is part of that process. It attempts to characterize someone or something on the basis of trivia and then project the significance into an invisible world which corrupters can arbitrate with no accountability.