Dominating persons assume that being totally at cause is the highest achievement. The problem is, domination requires lawlessness.

Dominators are not only lawless, they promote lawlessness as if it were a superior path in life. They don't accept validly created laws.

The process involving openness and accountability in determining what stable laws should be is rejected by dominators, because they want to arbitrate on a whim. Whim means make a good guess at why and always fail instead of openness and accountability which clarifies.

In other words, dominating persons lash out, and they don't want the abstractions of law getting in their way. They feel oppressed by laws placing restrictions upon them, and being unoppressed requires a destruction of validly created laws.

Dominators are constantly talking about freedom, because they feel they are deprived of the freedom to lash out by laws which inhibit their destructiveness.

Valid laws are created by society to diminish the destructiveness of corrupt persons. So corrupters don't like the result. They only feel free when no laws place restrictions on their mindless lashing out upon whim.

Domination is that way. To dominate is to lash out against opponents in a mindless way. It is mindless in contradicting all surrounding realities. It contradicts the claims of virtue by destroying the processes and persons who get in their way.

Dominators also contradict the claims of cause-and-effect relationships. They assume that all reality begins with their problem, and ending their problem is therefore a virtue. But they create their own problems through conflicts with the world around them.

Not accounting for the real causes of problems is mindlessness. The real cause of problems is in forces created by corrupt persons including dominators who assume destroying is the answer to their problems.