Creating bliss is what incompetent power mongers do. Bliss is the test of value that makes structured power the purpose of life for incompetent power mongers. Creating bliss is something they do better than anyone else. It's automatic. They do not have a philosophy or plan; in fact, they do not have awareness of any of the related concepts existing. They simply structure power as bliss, because it does what works for them.

Bliss works for incompetent power mongers because it is stripped of relevance. Relevance is a quagmire that they cannot extract themselves from. Bliss is a meticulous avoidance of relevance.

After WW-II there was exponential development. The persons driving the development came out of an impoverished background, not just the depression of the "dirty thirties," but the meagerness that extended through the 1950s. They had the purpose of making things work for the good of society.

Take away the development, and the relevance goes with it. The power mongers who took over everything, in a gradual and continuous manner, removed the development from the purposes, while relevance went out along with the development.

What is bliss and absence of relevance? It is fakery. Fakery is bliss. The fakery exists at multiple levels. In science and technology, fakery is a shift away from the mechanics of a subject and into the sociology of the activities. Spewing meaningless nonsense is sociology, not science or engineering. Why does anyone listen to the nonsense or promote it? To monger power through the bliss of irrelevance.

Relevance is the downfall of incompetent power mongers. Relevance tests the meaning of the subject and hence the competence of the persons. Without relevance, bliss can be created with no test of right or wrong.

Science doesn't look right when written up by incompetent power mongers. It has too many meaningless words with no explanations that make sense. Supposedly, geniuses can see knowledge behind the nonsense, because they know more than the rest of us. Even if that were true, it wouldn't be science, because science has a different purpose. Of course, there is no ingeniousness behind the garbage; it's a cover for incompetence.

There is an image to fakery that is supposed to make it superior to relevance. The image is synthesized from borrowed terminology. Fakes select word combinations that have been used successfully by someone else and insert them into their narrative. By selecting the word combinations which have been most successful in the past, the results are supposed to look like cutting edge progress.

You have to recognize the difference between nonsense and relevance to see what is wrong with the fakery. Word combinations cannot be transplanted without being miss-applied. But there is no such thing as miss-applying, when the whole purpose is to contrive fakery for power mongering purposes. It takes a progressive purpose to create the relevance that determines what fakery is.