Solving problems requires objective reality. Rationality is dependent upon keeping subjective reality out of the process, and corruption is the degree to which subjective reality replaces or mixes into objective reality.

Corruption is totally dependent upon subjectivity, because objectivity creates demands for standards of rationality which corrupters cannot meet. Also, objective reality condemns corrupters for their ignorance and corruptness.

This problem combines with corrupters being driven to get where they want to be by destroying opponents. Where they want to be is dominating and prevailing as a method of eliminating opposition, which they assume would solve their problems.

There is no uncorrupt way to get there. Dominating and prevailing means destroying. No one can function while being dominated by and prevailed over by incompetent destroyers.

The net effect is subjective attack upon persons and the rationality they need to live by. In fact, the corruptness of subjectivity is exploited (meaning maximized instead of minimized) as a method of destroying opponents.

For these reasons, subjective attack looks nothing like objective rationality. Yet the new normal that everyone is supposed to live by and accept is subjective attack replacing objective rationality. Prove it. It's such a starkly obvious fact that it doesn't need to be proven.

Subjective attack looks nothing like objective rationality. It's not a question of recognizing the difference, it's a question of what standard people should be living by. The assumption that people should be replacing rational constructivity with subjective attack is galling, but it is a force overwhelming society.

The problem of subjectivity overwhelming objectivity is vastly different from the promotion of values. In politics and related sociology, values need to be sorted out. Racism, for example, cannot be tolerated. Values have subjective origins but can be evaluated in an objective manner.

The problem is not whether subjective values exist or are mentioned but whether the process of rational evaluation is corrupted by subjective impositions being used to determine what objective reality and constructivity are.

TOP