August 6, 2024

Fraud-plus is the methodology of fascism. The difference between plain old fraud and fraud plus is what creates fascism. Fraud plus is the conspiring that sweeps up a whole society. A consensus has to be generated around fraud to create fascism.

Fascism is the socialization of corruption. It requires social structures to be corrupted by power mongers who convert them into power structures resulting in them being nonfunctional for constructive purposes.

With the social structures nonfunctional, fraud conspiracies are generated as wide-spread consensus with no ability to correct the frauds. Alignment upon fake science and technology is how modern societies are overwhelmed with fraud due to the obscurity of the science and the ability to shove real scientists and critics out of the process.

It wasn't Trump or even the conservatives that shows how and why corruption spread the way it did over recent decades. The ability to spread fraud was somewhat inhibited in politics, which created a lot of obstacles. It was the science and technology that erased the obstacles to fascism.

In retrospect, the reason why fascism is peculiar to recent times is due to the science and technology. The Nazis assumed they were invincible due to their command of science and technology. They expected to conquer the world with superior weaponry, while it was their inferior weaponry that defeated them.

That means the fake science and technology that has overwhelmed the social order explains why and how fascism prevailed. One of the major factors is that, unlike politics which is highly visible, science and technology are extremely obscure to the public. It was that obscurity that allowed the fraud to spread uninhibitedly.

If the public were told that the Supreme Court is no longer needed, it would go nowhere. But tell them "on par with coal," and they turn the world over to get rid of coal plants.

No criticism is allowed, as know-nothings promote fake science and technology while kicking real scientists out of the process or out of their jobs. That's an extremely unusual methodology. Why don't know-nothings kick the lawyers out of the legal system and promote chaos as the new form of government? The difference is the obscurity of science and technology.

Doesn't that result say there needs to be correct standards and methods in promoting science and technology? The reason why it doesn't say that is because the public is so disconnected from the complexities of science and technology that they think they know everything about it. It's the bliss of ignorance.

Why can't they be told? Because they already know all they need to know. When know-nothings can say scientists are deniers, they assume they know more about science than scientists do. Even if half of the scientists are incompetent frauds, it's not the know-nothings who are supposed to be telling us what the science is.