Physics is totally abstract, which is primarily why it is totally in error. The abstractness allowed incompetent power mongers to take over physics.

The biological sciences are mostly perceivable, which allows errors to be corrected and progress to move forward, though incompetents get by with a lot of corruption that doesn't get corrected.

Abstract reality does not exist for incompetent corrupters. Their problem is a lack of abstract reality, which is the same thing as knowledge. So they align the abstractions of physics upon their erroneous assumptions.

Stefan-Boltzmann Constant

All matter emits radiation constantly due to the vibration of molecules. The amount of radiation increases as temperature increases. There is a constant used to determine the amount of radiation based on temperature called the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (SBC). It is in error. It shows about 40 times too much radiation at normal temperatures.

For example, at the normal room temperature of 27°C, the SBC shows 459 watts per square meter. That's half of a table top emitting as much energy as five 100 watt light bulbs. Nothing resembling it is happening.

One of the consequences of the error is to show too much radiation emitted by the surface of the Earth. At the cold, average temperature of the earth (15°C, 59°F), the energy leaving the surface of the earth is said to be 79% radiation, while the other 21% leaves through conduction, convection and evaporation. A white hot light bulb could not emit 79% radiation without a vacuum environment. The amount of radiation should be 1-3%, which indicates that the SBC is off by a factor of 40.

To reduce the SBC by a factor of 40 would reduce the calculated global warming by a factor of 40, since the latter is based upon the amount of radiation which is emitted by the surface of the Earth. It means the supposed greenhouse effect is dependent upon an extreme error in the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.

You would think climatologists would have noticed the problem. Any who did would have been kicked out of science for mentioning it, because such errors have been accumulating in physics since 1845, when James Joule pretended to be stirring water in a wooden bucket to determine the definition of kinetic energy. No such experiment was possible, and the errors in physics have been accumulating ever since.

No experiment can determine if Joule was right or wrong, because there is no way to separate elastic force from inelastic force when stirring water. So I relied upon a mathematical proof of the error which Joule created, since I am an independent scientists and cannot be kicked out of science for doing so.

Simple math using high school level calculus and physics shows that kinetic energy is the same thing as momentum, which is mass times velocity (mv). Based on Joule's type experiments, physicists say velocity should be squared, so kinetic energy is proportional to mass times velocity squared (½mv²).

One of the consequences of squaring velocity in the definition of kinetic energy is that Einstein squared velocity in E=mc². There was no logic for Einstein's equation besides paralleling the erroneous definition of kinetic energy. Yet physicists depend upon his equation (E=mc²) to get huge amounts of energy from hydrogen fusion. Unsquare velocity in E=mc², and there is no significant energy in hydrogen fusion. Physics have never gotten significant energy from hydrogen fusion in 60 years of trying with dozens of ever larger particle accelerators, because E=mc² is in error.

Another consequence of the misdefinition of kinetic energy is fantasized technology based upon the assumption that electric motors have almost 100% efficiency. The maximum theoretical efficiency for any electric motor is 40%, while 25% is the usual. Engineers used to directly measure the efficiency by determining the amount of heat produced. Now days, they calculate the efficiency based upon erroneous physics and imagine 96% efficiency.