Science is overwhelmed by incompetent scientists who do not understand the abstractions of scientific knowledge and who impose their ignorance onto society. The result is reductionistic science which lacks the standards required for real science. Incompetents see nothing wrong with that process.

The reason why it isn't science is because it does not serve the purpose of science in producing basic knowledge in a reliable way. There is no basic knowledge without abstract reality.

Abstract means nonperceivable. Basic knowledge is not perceivable; it is an evaluation of relationships between realities. Relationships are not perceivable; they are abstract. (not the least reason why artificial intelligence will never do what human intelligence does. It's because abstract reality cannot be programmed.)

Omitting the abstract knowledge of a subject is to omit the entire essence. Nothing can be evaluated properly without the abstract knowledge that explains what it is.

Without abstract knowledge, everything comes out of a black hole with no accountability. Darkness is not the source of anything but corruption and fraud.

Persons who cannot handle abstract realities assume that abstract reality is a corruption which must be removed from science and everything else including education. They assume, if they cannot handle abstract reality, no one else can either, so the persons who can are just contriving reality and creating trouble. The difference is that it takes study to produce abstract reality as knowledge. The persons who refuse to study a subject do not acquire abstract reality.

Relativity

The most extreme example of science without the abstractions of knowledge is relativity. It has no relationship to anything in physics or laws of nature. E=mc² was guessed at by Einstein paralleling velocity squared in the erroneous equation for kinetic energy.

Relativity is attractive to scientists who get snowed by abstract reality, because there is no challenge to knowledge in the nonsense of relativity. Being totally devoid of objective reality, relativity is contrived, not evaluated. There is no wrong way to screw around with relativity, because objective reality is required to determine right from wrong. So millions of lines of relativity equations have been written without error.

Relativity is smoke-and-mirrors. Smoke-and-mirrors looks safe to persons who get snowed by abstract reality. So incompetents in science look for smoke-and-mirrors, such as relativity, for their source of truth and knowledge.

Fake Math For Greenhouse Gases

Fake math was used as the supposed definitive physics upon which the science of greenhouse gases is based. The fake math is called radiative transfer equations. Conservatives say the physics is spotless perfection, but global warming (due to greenhouse gases) is not occurring because of the effects of clouds. They don't want anyone to assume there could be corruption in power structures while they take the same position as the oil companies. I show the fake physics in radiative transfer equations.

Mindless Technology

Persons who lack abstract knowledge do not evaluate. Instead, they pick versions of reality from sources of power which they rely upon. Power is how their truth is packaged.

They are also extremely gullible. They believe the most incredible claims about renewable energy and electric vehicles.

Even if electric motors were 96% efficient, as bureaucrats claim, natural gas generators have a maximum efficiency of 40%, which no one disputes. Multiplying 96% of 40% is 38% efficiency for the total system, when not adding many additional losses. Yet bureaucrats claim electric vehicles get 59-62% efficiency "from grid to wheels."

Why tell us that, when there can never be more than 38% total efficiency when using their own numbers? What they are not saying is that electrical utility systems lose 75-90% from generators to customers. So total efficiency is between 10% and 24%, even when assuming 96% efficiency in electric motors.

But no one with common sense could assume an electrical transformation could be 96% efficient. Most persons know electricity produces heat in everything it is used for. The maximum theoretical efficiency for an electrical motor is 40%, with average use efficiency being 25%.

What it adds up to is the electric vehicles get about 10 miles per gallon equivalent, not the 100 to 150 miles per gallon equivalent claimed by frauds. In other words, the miss is a mile in the practicality of electric vehicles. Yet gullible fools expect to transform the world with electric vehicles.

No one can get past 15% renewable energy as solar and wind. Germany had to resort to coal plants, and England had to resort to nuclear plants, at about 15% solar and wind, because fluctuations are too disruptive. Somewhere in Australia, 21% renewables as solar and wind are being tried, but the problems are unsolvable.

Yet Americans keep talking about 100% renewables. Why can't they learn from everyone else? Because incompetent power mongers have no ability to evaluate. They don't know that they cannot do something that has been tried and found to be impossible.

The primary difference between real scientists and incompetents is that real scientists find out what they don't know. Incompetents don't.
 

The difference between real scientists and fakes is instantly recognizable in the standards. Anyone with a trace of self-respect, scientists or otherwise, provides information that can be evaluated for reliability and accountability. Fakes do the opposite: They produce nothing but slobber. Slobber means, we don't know for sure, but our best estimate is this and you better shape your lives by our opinion. Just trust us.