February 5, 2021

Information as knowledge is vastly different from information as exploitable tool. Guess which one is destroying the social order.

As knowledge, every tidbit of information tells something. As exploitable tool, nothing is relevant but a few meticulously designed falsehoods.

Fake science and technology are meticulously designed falsehoods. To electrify the transportation system, the surface of the earth would have to be covered with wires (in developed countries). Most of the wires could not go underground, because high voltages arc to the ground. That's before getting the batteries charged. Then several mountain ranges of metal are needed for the batteries.

Absence of knowledge is that way. It requires crossing the bridges after getting to them. Ten million electric vehicles hasn't told the nihilists that the metals are running out and the wiring is irreparably inadequate.

There have been any number of scientists and engineers who have tried to correct the subject matter. They were ignored and they no longer exist. The exploitable realities bowled over the subject matter.

So why would it be surprising that QAnon walks away with a political party? It's pretty hard to find knowledge in a political party.

What persons who are wrong have to say is more critical than what persons who are right have to say. The persons who are wrong are forging new ground—it needs to be understood—while persons who are right are wearing out old ground.

Yet, corruption cannot be corrected, because criticism is not reliable enough to waste time with. Selectivity is how corruption is produced. Knowledge is not selective; it's all inclusive.

The wrong formula is being learned to a point of being a requirement. Reality is being handled as a screening process, not as an evaluation process. Isn't that what Trump spent four years doing: screening instead of evaluating? He assumed he could screen staff to get the winning formula of sycophants who would turn his sin and ignorance into gold.

There are official critics in the opinion sections of the news. They have to be extremely superficial particularly being experts on everything. The fact that they are needed at all shows that the criticism does not exist in the rest of the media. Separating them out shows that the rest of the media is devoid of that information. Critical evaluation is supposed to be an element of all reality, not a side-line.

The media acquired the false assumption that being fair requires being noncritical. Being noncritical puts error and corruption on an equal basis with right and constructive.

All knowledge needs to be applied to all reality all of the time. It's a demanding thing to do. Exploiting is something incompetents do.