 |
|
 |
November, 2019 Many critics have recognized that global warming is a belief system due to the disconnect from objective reality as evidence or scientific explanation. Belief systems have their own logic. Here is how the logic works for the global warming belief system: The general concept of the belief system is that radiation goes up and comes back down to heat the surface of the earth. Arrows going up and coming down take care of the science. Ultra Theism Ultra theism is the reason for not looking at evidence. Power replacing objective reality creates ultra theism. Power is supposedly the source of truth and righteousness with ultra theism. Christ created the basis for science by saying, look and listen to acquire understanding and judge for yourselves what is right. All humans are supposed to be doing what scientists do, which is determining what reality is from a study of the evidence. Ultra theism is the opposite; it's refusing to look and listen, because power determines what reality is. Power determining what reality is is a conspiracy of incompetents for making sin pay. Conspirators for power need artificial reality to separate them from the objective reality which exposes their incompetence and corruptness. Disconnected From Objective Reality To incompetents who depend upon a power structure to fix their problems, being disconnected from objective reality is a good thing rather than a bad thing, because objective reality creates their problems rather than solves them. It exposes their incompetence and corruption. The answer for them is to get their reality elsewhere. And guess where that elsewhere is: It's conspired reality sifted for mongering power. It's a purifying process. If reality has not been sifted for mongering power, it is in conflict with mongered power. Objective reality is that way. So objective reality is the problem rather than the answer to incompetent power mongers. This is why the fake consensus of 97% of the scientists replaces evidence for global warming. Evidence is garbage, while consensus is virtue. Incompetents can speak for the peer reviewed scientists, while critics cannot. In the rational world, persons describing a subject disappear and bring objective reality forward, so the result is the same for everyone independent of who says so. But not for power mongers; if it doesn't come from their authority figures, it must be stomped out of existence. When they could not possibly be wrong, lying is just embellishing the truth; it isn't being wrong.
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
