December 26, 2021

Immunity starts with cellular immunity, while antibodies in the blood are an extended complexity. Within cells, the entire DNA genome and protein synthesizing machinery can be utilized, which is vastly more complex than a single protein in the blood.

Cellular immunity has been recognized for more than a century as distinct from antibody production. But there is no (direct) evidence on the internet of cellular immunity existing. In fact, the phrase cellular immunity has been (at a particular point in time) redirected to "cell mediated immunity" on Wikipedia. Cell mediated immunity is nothing but word salad for the production of antibodies. Why the nonsensical words? Everything in biology is cell mediated. Why not cell mediated digestion, or cell mediated breathing? Because the phrase "cell mediated" was designed to look sort of like cellular, so it could replace cellular immunity in the pretense that there is (no longer) any such thing as cellular immunity.

Why the obliteration of cellular immunity on the internet? It's because of the pandemic. The transition in phraseology is quite recent in responding to the pandemic. There is an evolution to the process, as two sets of realities come into conflict with each other. On the one hand are universal realities including five hundred years of evolving scientific knowledge. On the other hand is propaganda by incompetent power mongers who cannot tolerate objective reality producing rationality which exposes them as the incompetent power mongers that they are.

The visible part—the tip of the iceberg—showed up as journalists hyping vaccines as wonderous magic that do things the immune system has never done before. Some of the journalists have been saying that the vaccines will produce immunity that getting the disease will not produce, as if a new form of immunity produced in laboratories was leaving half a billion years of evolution behind.

Why the motive? The underlying reason is the same as why incompetent journalists created the social concerns over greenhouse gases, renewable energy, electric vehicles and self-driving. They need artificial reality which they can dominate. They can't dominate objective reality; they need fraud to make themselves the winners that they want to be.

Then, as the propaganda develops and conspirators reinforce each others claims, a polarization takes form between the fraudulent realities and the universal truths that overwhelm corrupters. The inability of corrupters to prevail over the universe makes them more determined and absurd.

What then is cellular immunity? It is a whole lot of responses to disease that antibodies do not produce. To understand cellular immunity, search the internet for "interferons" rather than immunity. Interferons are the controllers of cellular immunity.

Cellular immunity starts with recognition of disease entities (if viruses are not organisms). Recognition is followed by a large array of responses. One of the responses is production of enzymes for destroying the genetic material and proteins of the disease entities. Those enzymes are vastly different from the antibodies which attach to an antigen of the disease entity.

Among the strange reactions of cellular immunity is to destroy or inactivate infected cells. One method of inactivation is to induce production of a protein called p53—a very peculiar element of gene regulation. That protein covers sections of the DNA making some genes nonfunctional. Increasing p53 makes many genes nonfunctional, so infected cells cannot produce more viruses—nothing resembling antibody activity, huh.

The social result is that a lot of persons have been convinced that getting vaccinated takes care of everything; and on that basis, society was in the process of opening back up. It wasn't just the Omicron version of the disease that caused the pandemic to flare back up. The flare ups have been following a social activity pattern rather than a vaccination pattern. Netherlands had 86% fully vaccinated; and the disease flared up due to increased social activity. (▼▼▼)

One of the problems is that the new vaccines based on mRNA cannot produce much cellular immunity, because the molecules are tiny compared to whole viruses. In the recent past, vaccines were based on attenuated viruses, which produced something close to normal, cellular immunity. But attenuated virus vaccines take about ten years to produce. So there was no choice but to use mRNA vaccines.

The result is that the new vaccines are not as effective as previous vaccines. Yet propagandists have been saying the opposite—that the vaccines will produce more immunity than getting the disease will. People would not have been caught off guard so much if the propagandists had not been lying to them.

The best protection from spreading the virus is masks and social distancing, because the Corona virus does not spread easily when such precautions are taken.

The virus evolved in bats in a cave, where it only had to move a few millimeters through the air to spread from one bat to another. As a result, it did not protect its surface proteins, which take the form of an extended, protein spike. Those proteins dry easily, perhaps in 10 or 20 seconds in the air depending upon humidity.

By contrast, the flu virus protected its surface proteins by surrounding them with other proteins and lipids which slow down the drying process. So flu will survive a minute or two in the air before becoming ineffective due to drying.

Even if masks do not stop all of the viruses, they remove the larger clumps which survive longer in the air before drying. And of course, distancing increases the time required for spreading.