 |
|
 |
August, 2020 Conservatives promote values only. They never discuss anything relevant or specific, because truth exposes them for the corrupters that they are. They are fighting a war against the lower classes and vulnerable persons, while pretending to have noble purposes of lowering taxes or creating freedom. Lowering taxes means throwing trillions of tax dollars at corporations, which they don't need, so the government can't afford social programs to assist the needy. They rip off the needy, as if the lower classes can live on air and claim they are producing a work ethic by getting rid of dependency. Why do corporations depend upon the government instead of a work ethic? The universe defines life. The universe is totally objective reality. Therefore, sustaining life, which means solving problems, requires objective reality which is not degraded by subjective influences; and socialized realities must be free from subjective influences. Objectivity means the persons are not supposed to be talking about themselves; yet themselves is all conservatives talk about, because they are driven to dominate, which puts them in conflict with everyone else and the universe which defines life and the solutions to problems. Conservatives do nothing but promote their subjective influences as values and motives, because they are self-centered. Life does not get sustained, and problems do not get solved, at the standards of conservatives. In fact, conservatives despise the concept of solving problems, which is why they hate the liberals and lower classes—for demanding that problems get solved. Conservatives are fighting a war against the rationality which is demanded for solving problems, because rationality causes truth to evolve, and the first truth of any subject is the incompetent corruption of power mongers. Conservatives are the incompetent corrupters who design their social purposes around mongering power. Mongering power is always a corruption, because subjective purposes are imposed in conflict with the objective realities of life to monger power. Conservatives fight a war against the lower classes to preserve their cultural identity. The conservatives' purpose is to create a group and amass power for the group. Conservatives in government don't represent; they impose their purpose onto society trying to reshape the world as they want it to be. They have to strip government of its purposes to do that. Representing is giving other persons the opportunity to run their own lives and decide for themselves how they want to live. Government is supposed to provide opportunities, not control and dominate. Conservatives are promoting a cause. It's a losing cause, because it is corruption. Failing to succeed at promoting a losing cause results in a lot of determination to succeed. The result is that their cause overrides everything conservatives do and other purposes are re-aligned upon the ulterior motive of promoting the conservative cause. The reason for that result is because doing that is what corrupters always do, while conservatives are attempting to use a political process as a tool for the purpose of corrupters. The underlying purpose of corrupters is to prevail. Prevailing requires power. Mongering power requires corruption, because incompetent corrupters cannot improve themselves as a method of prevailing. They wouldn't be trying to prevail if they were competent; they would be trying to accomplish something real. So corrupters stomp others under to prevail against them. Only the most vulnerable persons can be stomped under by incompetents. So conservatives are a group of like-minded incompetents fighting a war against the lower classes as a method of mongering power by prevailing against persons who are vulnerable to the onslaught. As always, corrupters need a rhetoric which states the opposite of the purpose. So the claim of conservatives is that they are improving the moral state of society and their victims and saving money doing so. Creating a work ethic is supposedly one of the results. The lower classes will supposedly learn to work more when stomped under. All government activities beyond military squandering are opposed on that basis. When someone claims the work ethic needs to be improved, they have a responsibility to do something constructive for that purpose, not destroy others to get the result. That means progressiveness. Progressive try to improve an economy to provide the jobs that the fake work ethic claims to promote. Claiming to create a work ethic while destroying jobs is perversion of the social process. Of course, conservatives claim to be improving the economy by having corporations burn tax dollars. The fact that the claimed result never follows is supposedly irrelevant to the noble purpose. So the path of conservatives consists of failing at a fraudulent purposes, repeatedly and endlessly. Where progressives actually accomplish a result, conservatives destroy economies claiming to have a noble purpose. Results are the difference. Where conservatives sanctify their destructivity with fraud, progressive improve the social order. And of course, conservatives fight tooth and claw to prevent progressive from improving the social order, because their purpose is the opposite of their claims, and they cannot achieve their desired result of prevailing against vulnerable persons with an improved social order. But improvement by these criteria means solving problems. That isn't what conservatives consider to be improvement. To them, improvement means promoting their values and motives, which is showing up as fascists promoting white racism. Conservatives create a commiserating group of persons who react against a force which they do not understand. They claim the opposing force is liberalism. In actuality, it is objective reality as contacted through rationality which imposes truth upon them. But having no concept that there is such a thing as objective reality, conservatives assume all rationality is liberalism being unfairly imposed upon them. Conservatives feel justified in attacking the opposing force, simply because they find it to be unacceptable. The result is a self-righteous attack upon objective reality and rationality assuming them to be an arbitrary imposition by liberals. Trump's endless complaint of being dealt with unfairly shows that conservatives are a commiserating group. It’s similar to not having Nixon to kick around anymore—what Nixon said in 1962. Conservative claims are subverted by the ulterior motive of increasing the power of the group. Always having that motive, their claims are always a fraud. Conservatives have gone full totalitarian fascism. They are defying all laws that get in their way and operating by self-contradictory whims with no plans or procedures. Destroying opponents to acquire unaccountable power is their only purpose. Sacrificing the economy, social structures and the government is part of the process. Their method of getting there was getting rid of the "swamp," which meant throwing out anyone who would not worship the ruler. Officials were endlessly discarded searching for the few who would worship the ruler to promote totalitarian fascism. Conservatives are showing us that their purpose is the same as fascists and Nazis—the simple reason being that all corruption has the same basic causes and characteristics, while only the surrounding context varies. In other words, the purpose of conservatives isn’t to create an arbitrary political group but to impose corruption onto society. But corrupters don’t know what corruption is; they assume it is an improved standard. How could a criminality-based real estate developer know anything about government or complex social structures? He didn't need to know anything about anything to produce totalitarian fascism. Autocratic totalitarianism is not a form of government. It's a self-destruction process by incompetent corrupters who have no comprehension of what government consists of. Conservatives impose values and nothing other than that, because they are disconnected from objective reality which is supposed to replace values in social interactions. People have a right to not have values imposed upon them. Everyone's values are somewhat different; and they have a right to be different. Conservatives are hell bent on erasing differences. They have no right to do so. There is no reality element to the conservative purpose. The purpose is group power for incompetent corrupters as a method of prevailing where rationality is a failure. They are striving for directed power to subdue enemies which has no possibility of constructivity without objective reality. Can anyone say what the "Tea Party" is for besides attacking opponents? What conservatives are for is like hugging the color of tea. Someone else has to solve their problems, while they blame everyone else for creating their problems. They are for nothing and against everything. Conservatives don't look right. They are imposing a socially unacceptable standard onto society. It consists of values (which are subjective), where objective reality is required in general social interactions. Values very from person to person and cannot be imposed. Then their imposed subjectivity takes the form of claims and accusations which have no explanations. When questions are raised, they are supposed to be answered. Conservatives leave all questions hanging with nothing but their values for answers. Conservatives are like a liquid where there is supposed to be a solid. They flow with their motives and allow nothing to get in their way. Laws are their biggest obstacle, so they are lawless. What do conservatives do that is constructive? All they do is fight against enemies. They are against everything and for nothing. Constructivity requires procedures. Conservatives do not follow procedures of any sort. They assume that having the right values is all it takes to solve everyone's problems. Someone else has to put together social structures and technology. Conservatives assume that rationality is a scheme against them, because they always lose where there is rationality. They don't know that rationality is how products and ordered existence are created. So they are driven to exterminate rationality from the human society. If conservatives could carry their purposes to an end point, which cannot yet occur in the U.S., they would have a totalitarian dictatorship. Their purpose is to strip all accountability created through laws from their standard and operate by whim with nothing standing in their way. Without laws and accountability, nothing exists but totalitarian dictatorships. Conservatives talk endlessly about law, speaking in opposites as rationalizations. What they mean by law is undefinable vagaries used as a pretext for their whimsical lawlessness. One of the biggest mysteries about conservatives since they took over the world in 1981 is what end point are they trying to get to. "Morning in America" and "Freedom Fighters" don't tell us much. Continuous and drastic changes over the past 40 years get conservatives ever closer to their goal. Trump is not only the most complete manifestation of the goal of conservatives, he is immensely more visible than politicians usually are. So he shows quite clearly what conservatives have been trying to get to. The most striking characteristic of Trump's is that everything must emanate from him with no law or opposing force getting in the way. Conservatives have been trying to nudge government in that direction through slogans such as "small government" and "deregulation." Another closely related characteristic of Trump's is whimsicalness. Without laws, whim is all that exists. One of the purposes of laws is not just to shape the social order but to stabilize the realities so they can be aligned upon. Without the stable realities of laws, the whims are constantly changing, unpredictable and self-contradictory. A lot of countries didn't need 40 years to get there. They simply decreed the result any old time; and analysts refer to the result as a totalitarian dictatorship. Of course, conservatives never allow negative terminology for their gifts to man, but there is no positive terminology for a totalitarian dictatorship. Dictatorships are always totalitarian, because an absence of laws leaves no other social responsibility than worshipping the emperor (dictator). Worship replaces all rationality. There is no reality element to worshipping the dictator. It never changes as the dictator contradicts himself and goes in circles with moronic stupidity. Conservatives sure are agitated for not having definable purposes. Instead of reality defining their purposes, it's values. They are trying to change human values. The values that they want are elitism and bigotry. Elitism says power mongers must be built up with no regard for their worthlessness. Bigotry ways powerlessness is corruption. Elitism and bigotry get conservatives where they want to get to with no regard for reality. Those values strip reality from the status conservatives want. They want to lord over others with no reality getting in the way.
Conservatives do not describe their claims—neither their supposed results nor accusations against opponents. Instead, their words do one thing only: demand allegiance to their cause. They are cause driven, because their corruptness puts them in conflict with the universe. In the background, they rip off everyone below them to finance their power mongering schemes. They must do everything in the dark, because there is no justification for their purposes and breaking laws is how they proceed. To rip off vulnerable persons, they squander money in every way possible and claim they can't afford anything. They burn trillions of tax dollars on corporations which have no use for the money in claiming they can't afford pennies for social programs. Their demand for privatization is their door to corruption. Their purpose is not to produce results but to escape accountability. Everything government does requires accountability. Private business does not. For conservatives, free enterprise means freedom to operate by criminal standards. Conservatives are driven to produce a logic for their cause. They are totally certain that they are right; and therefore, there should be a logic that explains their basic assumption. But as hard as they try, they cannot produce the desired logic. The obvious reason why is that they a totally devoid of the abstract reality required to properly evaluate the subject. In trying to produce a simplistic logic the result is ridiculousness in contradicting the abstract realities which conservatives are not aware of. Basically, what conservatives are trying to say is that everyone is trying to prevail against everyone else, and it should be the winners who do the winning, while libs are trying to get the losers to do the winning. Making winners out of losers is assumed to be defying the proper order of existence. The main thing conservatives get wrong is their assumption that everyone is trying to prevail against everyone else. Only corrupters are trying to prevail against everyone else. Prevailing against others is a basic characteristic of corruption. Rational persons are tying to solve problems by working constructively with persons who have problems, which primarily means vulnerable persons—no prevailing against others involved. Trying to solve problems for vulnerable persons appears to be trying to make winners out of losers in the view of conservatives—an upset of the natural order of things in the assumptions of conservatives. It's an absence of awareness in the area of human activity for the purpose of solving human problems. Conservatives have no awareness in that area, because they are too incompetent to attempt to solve human problems. In fact, they have more difficulty in dominating to monger power, when human problems are being solved. So they assume there is something pernicious in the attempts to solve problems for vulnerable persons. Since liberals are trying to solve problems for vulnerable persons, conservatives assume the result is the ruination of man. That's why one of the primary goals of conservatives is to defeat the libs. With nothing for abstract reality (knowledge) the focus is on persons and the concern is who should be the winners. The result is a battle of us-against-them. Conservatives assume that defeating their enemies is the solution to their problems. What enemies should they defeat? Obviously, the lower classes and their sympathizers, the libs. Conservatives try to get elected by attacking opponents rather than describing purposes, because the truth about their degeneracy would be visible if they described anything real. Attacking opponents consist of finding anything negative that can be used, relevant or not, for degradation. In doing that they frame liberals into an unrecognizable contrivance—so much so that liberals in Congress stopped calling themselves liberals after the Reaganites started the conservative process of degrading liberals. The degradations and name calling need to be devoid of specifics and explanations to prevent truth from defeating the conservatives. The results are so imaginary that they could be applied to the green Martians or a tree. But they rile up the base with nonsense, because the ability to amass power through nonsense is heroic to incompetent corrupters. What all incompetent corrupters are doing is fighting a war against the complexities of objective reality produced through rationality which they cannot competitively handle. Garbage politicking is moving in the right direction for that purpose. After three and a half years, there is nothing Trump has done but dismantle government and trade agreements, antagonize Europe and try to beat up China, Russia and Venezuela. Still, conservatives don't know why some persons hate Trump, as if government and trade were corruptions that should have never existed. Isn't that what conservatives always meant by small government and deregulation? They never said what should be left after small government and deregulation. They assume nothing should be left but their domination of society. August 25, 2020 The most ungodly thing about conservatives is the absence. Based on what? What evidence? What mechanism? Not only are the explanations missing, the claims are nothing but values. There is no objective reality to values. That's why the public domain is supposed to consist of objective reality rather than subjectivity. What is "church" in Trump's campaign slogan on church? He is adamant on retaliating for anything he considers to be a slight—not just in his actions but in his harping. Get rid of anyone who does not promote his interests. Allow no aid to go to states or localities controlled by Democrats. It's beyond an "eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." It's destroy everyone who is not a loyalist. Destroy all who are vulnerable—the immigrants, minorities, losers and lower classes. The church of what? Conservatives assume there is a magic button to solve every problem and they are the only ones who can push the magic button. They can't tell us what it consists of or how it works, but they must be kept in power, because they are the only ones who can fix everything with the magic button, and anyone who uses rationality, knowledge or science is swamp. Hint: The magic button is in themselves and how wonderful they are and how much they love everyone (except foreigners, minorities and losers [bottom 90% of society]) and how much we are supposed to pretend their decadence is wonderful without an iota of objective reality (method of getting there) being mentioned. Just take our word for it; we are that reliable; and it's none of your business what we are doing.
It's possible to evaluate everything conservatives do and not understand why they are doing it. Conservatives are obviously squandering tax dollars on corporations which don't have the slightest use for the money, so liberals cannot use the tax dollars to solve social problems. Easy to see but impossible to understand. It's obvious that conservatives promote torture in the prisons; they say so. Easy to see but impossible to understand. Corrupters don't know why they do what they do; but that doesn't mean it is unknowable; it means they are stupid. Awareness ends corruption, which means corrupters are not aware of their corruptness. In fact, and for the same reason, corrupters assume they are the highest achievement in existence. They use themselves as the reference for all that is right. Any amount of awareness would tell them otherwise; but they don't have that amount of awareness. Their lack of awareness makes them destroyers. The way it works is this: Lack of awareness means all of the complex and abstract realities look like nonsense to them. That in itself could perhaps be ignored. But endless reactions turn that lack of awareness into a machine for destructivity. Perhaps the first reaction or starting point for corruption is the sense of being left out, or even shoved out, of everything others do with the reason being that they are not competent enough to do what others do. So they draw the conclusion that if they could prevail against others, it would solve their problems. Prevailing is the same thing as domination. Domination is the most basic corruption which all other corruptions stem from. Once corrupters decide to use destructive means to prevail against others, a whole avalanche of consequences follow. First, no one is going to allow corrupters to destroy them for some false betterment. So opponents react against the result. Then endless secondary reactions develop, consisting of the determination of corrupters to be winners instead of losers. The simplest method of being a winner is to destroy opponents. So the mode of operation of corrupters is to destroy enemies and then align with similar corrupters to increase the power of numbers to facilitate the process. But the method of fighting the war is still not the complete explanation of why. The most significant element of why is in the reality medium. Corrupters are disconnected from reality by their lack of awareness. Yet reality is the make-up of all existence. So corrupters reconstruct a state of existence in conflict with the reality medium and fight a war against everything in the reality medium. To any rational person, no one is ever going to win a war against the reality medium. But corrupters don't know they can never defeat the reality medium, because they know nothing about the realities which they are cut off from and their original problem is being stupid. What it means is that all corrupters are linked together to fight a war against reality. They don't know what reality is, but they respond to the force reality creates. The power of truth is a force that comes out of the universe and defeats all corruption. With the purpose of defeating the opposing force of reality including all the methods of handling reality, particularly the rationality that creates truth, the reason why is not in the self-defeating results but the reactionary motive of defeating reality, its results and methods of handling realities. The conflict with reality reduces the existence of conservatives to subjectivity. That means they are absorbed in themselves and other persons. There existence is a war of "us against them." Everything constructive is attacked and destroyed in fighting their war against everything related to the reality medium. It's surprising how far the QAnon conspiracy spread in conservative circles. There are endless such conspiracies; and they create the foe conservatives are fighting. So an abstract, philosophical evaluation of that phenomenon is demanded. Obviously, conservatives are fighting a foe designed in their own heads, as no one vaguely meets the requirements attributed to them. A mechanism that does that in their heads is quite rudimentary. The starting point is a disconnect from objective reality. Corrupters willfully disconnect from reality, as their corruptness is exposed by objective reality. Without objective reality, there is no explanation for their problems. The more successful they are in perpetrating corruption, the more problems they have. Yet they are convinced that their corruptions are the answer to their problems. So the contradictions need an explanation; and the only thing that adds up to them is enemies causing their problems. But without objective reality to go by and their problems having other causes, imaginative enemies need to be synthesized as the explanation. Imaginative, synthesis, boogeyman, conspiracy—they all become part of the same process in shaping an explanation for the problems that corrupters create for themselves by trying to use corruption as the answer to their problems.
|
 |
Headings |
||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
