September 27, 2020

Conservatives don't produce proper communication. They don't explain; they make absurd claims without clarifying; they exploit vagaries which could mean anything and they attack opponents with accusations which have no relationship to reality.

The implication is that the purpose and meaning don't have to be visible. There is always supposed to be some hidden meaning in such communication. What then is the purpose of communication and how does anyone determine the hidden meaning?

It means corrupt communication is used for ulterior motives. Wouldn't that purpose be analogous to using an automobile as a chicken coop instead of driving it? That's what corrupt communication looks like to rational persons.

An example of corrupt communication is Trump's repeated insistence that Biden should take a drug test before the first debate. How could it be any business of Trump's if Biden is taking drugs? A lot of people are on various prescription drugs quite often. The implication of Trump's is to borrow from employers requiring a drug test, as if Biden were going to harm someone by misusing the equipment or create a disturbance on the job. Wouldn't trump win the debate more easily if Biden did such things? Of course. And accusatory implications (not explanations) add to Biden's demise regardless.

Relying upon corrupt communication means constructive purposes are not relevant. It's analogous to someone having no use for an automobile, so they get whatever they can out of it by using it as a chicken coop. In other words, corrupters are so far removed from constructivity that they have no need for constructive communication.

They would argue what constructivity means (if they wanted to come out into the open, which they don't). They would say they have a higher purpose for communication and the so-called constructivity is nothing but liberal (or communistic) stupidity. Unraveling all of that would be too monumental of a task, so only a few high points can be mentioned here.

Corruption requires darkness as concealment. So producing hidden meaning is a self-condemning standard which says, we need to conceal our version of virtue because it isn't really virtue at all.

That problem is highly visible evidence that corrupters are also wrong about what they consider constructivity to be. They wouldn't need to conceal their purpose, if it were real constructivity.

Real constructivity is producing results that people benefit from. The false version of constructivity which corrupters promote (they would never call it constructivity), meaning their sanctimonious purpose, does not produce a tangible product but some lied about benefit in the area of group power.

Should purposes produce tangible products or power for a group of corrupters? The should question is a values question. But if producing tangible products is not the purpose, who is supposed to produce the tangible products which corrupters are never going to separate themselves from?

That's a rationality analysis which never enters the universe of corrupters. They assume someone will always produce the products that they intend to rip off and they don't care how it is being done. In that abyss, they make tangible results less and less a part of life.

With that underlying motive, the communication of corrupters is designed to tear down the rationality of opponents rather than build up something worth while. Tearing down requires no competence or standards. Any form of destructivity will do. There is no wrong way to corrupt and destroy.

Weaponized communication does that. It's like someone trying to grow carrots while someone else is trying to shoot them in the back. Corrupters can't lose. That's how easy it is for them to take over the social structures and turn them into rubble. When they succeed, no one is going to produce the tangible products that corrupters need for mongered power, but knowing that is beyond the ability of corrupters to evaluate.