May 26, 2021

Conservatives cannot accept things as they are. They are driven to change. How could they claim to oppose change, if they are driven to change? They speak in opposites, because they are not evaluative; they are reactionary.

Speaking in opposites is a counter-measure to truth for conservatives. They don't appear to realize it. They simply find that it works.

But more relevant than the labeling problem is that conservatives do not allow us to lead our own lives. We have to conform to their wishes. (Own the libs.) To conform to the wishes of Trump and sycophants meant dismantling government and reverting to a fascist dictatorship.

So of course, liberals do a lot of criticizing or opposing. But it is not the same thing as hijacking someone else's life. The difference is in using words or force. When using words, people are still allowed to make their own decisions. When using force, they aren't. (In the so-called cancel culture, liberals do the complaining, while conservatives do the firing.)

And still, conservatives assume that their impositions are more justifiable than the words used by liberals. The reason why could not be clearer: Words cause truth to evolve, and no one defies the power of truth when significantly developed.

What it means is that conservatives feel the power of truth and find it to be unacceptable and overwhelming. Their impositions with force are assumed to be an improvement. But the use of force is destructive and unacceptable, while the power of truth defines life.

In other words, conservatives do not take a rational position aligned upon the good of man in sustaining life. Instead, they take a reactionary position, where they don't like to be corrected, and perpetrating injustices against other persons makes them feel good.

Conservatives using government to advance those motives is a corruption of every concept of government, laws and the Constitution. Yet they claim to be the protectors of law and the Constitution. They speak in opposites to protect themselves from the truth and don't know it. They do not evaluate to determine the truth of what they do. They do what feels good as a reaction and are clueless on the criminal nature of their feel-good reactions.

Stated simply, it is not appropriate to use the government to change anything; yet conservatives use government for nothing other than that. And it is not socially acceptable or constructive to be imposing anything onto other persons through force; yet conservatives do nothing other than that.

Conservatives do those things reactively, because they do not evaluate; they simply do what feels good. Being corrupt feels good, when their incompetence and corruptness create social conflicts. They alleviate the social conflicts by subduing opponents rather than getting constructive.

Conservatives do not determine right or wrong through evaluation; they do whatever seems to work in making them feel good and then impose the result upon everyone as the assumed definition of what is right. In doing that, they impose their criminality onto everyone.

What animates conservatives is quasi-rejection. Others view their incompetence and corruptness negatively. Conservatives don't like that. They assume it is ignorance and foolishness that cause opponents to view them negatively.

Over time, corrupters acquire the assumption that their corruptions are a superior standard—literally bits of brilliance. The reason is because corruption is an adaptation process to the problems that corrupters acquire. The adaptation seems to be a solution to their problems, which is translated in their minds as a superior standard.

There is always a tendency to assume other persons are similar to oneself. All the more so for incompetents who do not evaluate. So corrupters assume that the answer to their problems must be the answer to everyone's problems, which means corruption is the answer to everything. If viewed negatively by opponents, then opponents must be ignorant trouble-makers.

The tertiary level reaction of corrupters is that they are superior persons due to their realization that corruption solves problems and that they have the ability to solve problems through corruption, but naive persons do not accept that solution. So, "own the libs."

The assumption of superiority gets corrupters into a lot of trouble. It causes them to act upon their problems, because they are promoting something necessary. Acting upon corruption means creating problems for everyone else.

The Resulting Sociology

Conservatives are trying to redesign life for everyone. It's not a justifiable thing to do. It's a defiance of related laws and Constitutional purposes. Conservatives reduce government to totalitarian fascism as a methodology.

QAnon was designed to replace rational constructivity with directed energy for conservative purposes. The methodology was to replace subjective and personal decision-making with external control over results—a nongovernmental process with the same purposes and standards as the totalitarian fascism being created in government—the use of high technology to invade, control and redirect human activity toward totalitarian fascism.

Objective reality controlled by rationality is the protection from that result. The necessary objective reality and rationality are erased by lying. The lying is not credible and is said to not be taken seriously, while it is imposed. Doing that is an erasure process. It erases objective reality controlled by rationality. Lying does that.

It's like replacing an automobile with a block of wood. The block of wood is not expected to be an automobile. It is expected to erase the use of an automobile.

Arbitrariness requires stripping away rationality, because rationality runs interference with arbitrariness. The universe requires rationality to solve problems. Disconnecting from the objective reality that the universe creates is needed to defy the requirements for life. Pathological lying is required to do all of that.

Totalitarian fascism has that purpose—to replace rationality with nonrationality. All laws and evolved social standards have to be erased to promote the conservative purpose. Totalitarian standards do that in government.

Something similar is being designed to do the same thing outside government. Objective reality and rationality are being removed from social existence through high technology. Mechanisms are being designed into high technology for that purpose.

The pattern with high technology starts with intrusiveness. Personal and subjective realities are acquired to every extent possible and used to control personal and subjective results.

The pretense is to improve marketing, while marketing is not improved by doing that. Corporations have determined that they do not sell more products as a result. Yet they redirect available resources to that purpose, which creates a shortage of money for other purposes including media support.

Why do corporations do that? They do it for the conservative purpose of redirecting human activity. Corporations have a large amount of uncommitted resources to use for arbitrary purposes. Those resources are being redirected to the conservative cause.

The reason why (the purpose of the conservative cause) is to monger power as a method of getting more out of life than the incompetence and corruptness of the persons involved produce. Mongering power is the purpose of reducing human existence to a control process through totalitarian fascism in government and its high technology corollary.

Conservatives didn't invent the power mongering purpose; it's that the power mongering purpose took over the conservative purpose. That result occurred because power became so available that it allowed incompetent corrupters to hijack the purposes of developed social activities. Conservatives and power mongers became aligned upon the same purpose.

The how and why was simply a distillation process, where persons who latched onto the conservative mentality were the ones with the most power in society. It started (the recent conservative diversion) so etherically that it looked almost arbitrary.

Power mongers were accustomed to justifying themselves with the slogans conservatives were using. It was all untrue rationalizing—claiming to reduced spending and waste, while they promote wantonness and waste—standards that became exploitable for speaking in opposites as a justification mechanism.

Sloganeering replaced rationality as the standard. The slogans could be designed for sanctimonious justification while promoting the opposite.

In that way, the conservative cause allowed power mongers to take over government and politics.

Stripping laws out of government and rationality out of social interactions allowed incompetent corrupters to hijack social existence and use the power to get more out of life than their incompetence and corruptness would produce.