 |
|
 |
August 27, 2020 We now see direct proof of what a lying bunch of fakes conservatives are in every area of politics. So it should be obvious that they are a bunch of lying fakes in harping on "right to life." They destroy and murder with no conscience.* How could they have any moral concerns over right to life? It was in fact the liberals who took up the concern of abortions after the Supreme Court decision. Liberals attempted to provide assistance and information to the women. That result was casting conservatives into an less moral position. Imagery is extremely important for conservatives, as being shown. So conservatives decided to hijack the issue for image purposes. There is absolutely nothing conservatives do to improve the problems related to abortions. They have never produced one word on the subject beyond claiming they are for right to life. At the same time, they create every problem related to the subject including the social difficulties behind many of the decisions. Two types of liberals have been evolving over recent decades. The clear meaning of liberalism evolved around social justice in terms of providing for the needy and protecting rights of vulnerable persons. But now there is evolving an issue-oriented liberalism which claims a liberal promotes certain issues, now days focusing on fake global warming and renewable energy. Green transformed from an environmental concern to environmental destruction. When those types of liberals take up the abortion issue, they counter the conservative position without getting into the social justice issues. In countering the conservative position, the fake liberals solidify the conservative position producing a false morality for conservatives. Conservatives couldn't care less who has an abortion. The outspoken ones are 99% males who will never be faced with the decision, so they have nothing to lose in lying about it. Real liberals consider respect for the laws of government to be essential for creating an ordered human existence and attempt to promote social justice through those laws. So they insist on the Supreme Court decision on abortion being respected. Also, it is not proper in a democracy to impose moral values onto society. Majority values need to be respected in a democracy. It means rational persons cope with the moral views of the majority as defined by the laws and women have a right to abortions independent of personal values. Rational Catholics insist on upholding the law as a right to abortions even when they have opposing values, as exemplified by Senator Kennedy. The persons who say they cannot tolerate abortions are in effect saying they know nothing of the death, destruction, misery and disease that the rest of us have to live with day after day due to corrupt politics being presented as the answer to everything by conservatives. Adding abortions to the list of wrongs may be an appropriate expression of values. But have you ever seen an abortion opponent adding anything to their abortion concerns? It's unheard of. (Maybe with the Pope, but not in the U.S., are the other wrongs listed with abortions). If they did know of all the wrongs, they could never be a conservative, but they always are. (Some of the popes were conservatives, but the moral truth that Christ produced was liberalism, which is why conservative evangelicals skip over the social morality that Christ taught and promote conservative politics only.) Christ was a social justice warrior who started the cancel culture. When conservatives have a complaint about that it means their purpose is to subvert Christianity, not promote it. When liberals are accused of creating a cancel culture, the meaning then is defined as social criticism and firing is not done at that level. Administrators abhor social criticism, but they respond to pressure of groups by firing someone as the solution.
*Conservatives are destroyers and murderers. Every decision they make results in destruction of life. They then claim they are solving some problem, which has no relationship to reality. The problems which conservatives claim to be solving have no relationship to the problems which result, which implicitly means the resulting problems are collateral damage, not the original intent. Conservatives are destroying planet Earth as collateral damage, while the claimed purposes disappear in ridiculous fraud. There is a moralistic fraud in the endless claim or implication that incidental destructivity is a necessay price to pay for some other noble pupose. That assumption is fraud. The moral responsiblity is to account for all elements of a result including extended effects. The clearest example is the endless drive for tax cuts. The corporations pay almost no taxes anymore. They couldn't care less about tax cuts. Yet they ate about $3 trillion tax dollars during the Trump years. Some businessmen have been pleading to be taxed more because of a feeling of social responsibility. So the only consequence of tax cuts is to burn government money so it can't be used to solve social problems. Those social problems kill people. Promoting them turns conservatives into remorseless murderers. Pretending that those results are side effects when they are the only effects adds lying to the murdering. Conservatives have lately been trying to pin the homeless problem onto liberals, as if liberals could shove the homeless off the planet as the solution to the problem. Liberals are supposed to disappear the problem after conservatives create it. The tiniest fraction of the tax dollars conservatives have been burning would solve the homeless problem. Various types of housing could be produced for the homeless. When liberals try to do so, conservatives revolt claiming liberals are trying to destroy the lily white environment that conservatives promote. For the sake of their version of a desirable environment, conservative prevent the homeless problem from being solved. That's collateral damage promoted for a set of fake values. A real economy which includes everyone would reduce the homeless problem to the persons who have psychological and drug problems which could be handled through other means. Instead, conservatives concocted a hierarchical economy which extracts from the bottom of society and burns resources at the top.
|
 | |||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
