 |
|
 |
Irrational corrupters insist that imposing their irrationality onto everyone is a right that they are being denied. Their assumed right always is being denied, because irrationality is a conflict with the objective reality that the universe consists of. That means, to gain the denied right, corrupters have to obliterate rationality. A normal dispute concerns the shape of reality. It's a different type of dispute that corrupters produce. They are disputing a right to oppose objective reality, not determine its characteristics. Don't they know that no one is supposed to be opposing objective reality? They don't know that. They assume objective reality is for fools and they are fighting for a superior standard. Not only is it a self-righteous battle, it is backed by the assumption of some grave injustice in not allowing the superior standard to prevail—the answer to everything being unfairly denied and suppressed. The conflict between good and evil is based on the assumption of corrupters that irrationality is superior to rationality. Comparing irrationality to rationality is a false equivalence. Rationality is an element of constructivity which must be a part of all life. Irrationality is a destruction of life and the standards required to sustain life. Sustaining something and destroying something are not equivalencies. Corrupters don't know that. They assume the opposite—that rationality is for fools—because they are not only incapable of producing rationality, they are incapable of imagining what rationality does. They view rationality as a destructive act, because is creates unsolvable problems for them. Carried to an end point, the dispute is constructivity vs. destructivity. But corrupters don't know what the processes of rationality or irrationality lead to. They only see the immediate result of irrationality being the answer to their problem of being snowed by rationality. Irrationality means false relationships between realities. It fixes the ignorance problem by substituting falsehoods for realities. It's not only easy to use false realities, it allows reality to be misaligned to promote the motives of corrupters. Are rational persons unfair to oppose that? In the view of corrupters, rational persons are the cause of all problems for not allowing the superior standard of irrationality. One of the deficiencies of modern journalism is the often-encountered assumption that irrational corrupters must be given equivalence to rational persons. The irrationality is promoted as if it were valid. Part of the problem might be no ability to distinguish between rational and irrational and part might be an attempt to be fair to irrational corrupters in their claims of being dealt with unfairly. Of course, Trump creates a model example for irrational corruption. He is constantly complaining about fairness, as if irrational corruption were supposed to be promoted out of fairness. |
 | ||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
