Moral Philosophy
 
 
      

Home
Detailed Pages
▼▼▼  
 

Moral Philosophy  278

 
The Requirements Of Humanness

 

September 1, 2022

Corrupters assume they are improving upon humanness through corruption. That's what Reaganites meant by a "new normal" they said they were creating.

When corrupters encounter demands placed upon them, they assume there should be no demands placed upon them and the standard needs to change. The primary standard that corrupters operate by is subjectivity.

Subjectivity is inappropriate for general social interactions, because it interferes with problem solving that requires objectivity aligned upon the laws of the universe.

A common form of subjectivity is promotion of values. Values are highly varied and cannot be imposed without creating conflicts. Lies are another form of subjectivity which create destructive results.

The universe creates human life and defines the requirements for sustaining human life. Solving problems is required to sustain human life. Objective reality is required for aligning life upon the universe that creates life.

Objective reality is that which originates outside a person's mind. Subjective reality originates within a person's mind.

Only the objective realities aligned upon the laws of the universe determine constructivity. All objective realities have a relationship to the laws of the universe which influence them and give them meaning. A lie is subjective; but knowing that it exists is objective and interpreting its significance is objective.

Corrupters are self-centered in trying to impose their corruptions onto society in opposition to the objective requirements for life. They put themselves in conflict with objective reality through their corruptness. They avoid objective reality and promote subjective reality, which is nonconstructive.

Conservatives promote subjective purposes and politically campaign subjectively. It's inappropriate and obnoxious. Yet conservatives assume it is the only valid standard.

Conservatives claim journalists are liberals, when journalists don't say they are liberals, because subjectivity is not normally acceptable in journalism, though it is the nature of conservative media in it's corruption of journalistic standards.

Conservatives are tearing education apart for not promoting their values. Objective history is not supposed to be replaced with values in the general social dialog including education. Conservatives cannot accept that fact.

When conservatives can't accept a result, they are supposed to be correcting errors through objective rationality rather than trying to prevent what they don't like. But since conservatives are incompetent at producing rationality, they try to prevent instead of correct and impose values instead of dealing with objective realities.

So the question is, is there a proof or logic that would have any meaning in telling conservatives that what they do is not appropriate or socially acceptable. None so far. Conservatives are fighting to change social standards; and they view their purpose as virtue in the subjective promotion of their values.

One of the main points of logic is the Nazi logic of the so-called Aryan race. It was a false and criminal logic; yet it is the same purpose conservatives have with their imposed values. They want to produce a superior white race and related values by dismantling the protective laws of government and using the power of government to impose their values onto society.

Conservatives assume they are innately superior, because they promote values instead of objective realities. The real reason why is because they lose at promoting objective realities due to their incompetence. Rationality is required to promote objective realities. That process is too complex for incompetent corrupters; so incompetent corrupters join the conservative cause in replacing rationality with imposition of their values onto everyone.

Did the Nazis have the answers to society's problems? Would they have solved everyone's problems if they defeated the Allies and won WW-II? The Nazis had already defeated themselves by destroying their exploits. They turned against the Russians due to a shortage of energy which they wanted to steal from the Russians.

The Nazis defined what is wrong with the conservative cause, because the underlying corruptions are always the same for all corrupters. The underlying forces never vary for corruption. Corrupters try to replace objective reality with their subjective purposes due to their incompetence; and they convince themselves that there is no other valid standard in society, which they assume makes them innately superior to rational persons.

Isn't self-serving subjectivity the only possible way humans can do things? Conservatives assume so. They assume one person's gain is another person's loss (called zero sum). So why not "us" winning instead of our enemies?

Here's why. The universe says otherwise. The laws of the universe say human life can only be sustained through the objective realities defined by the laws of the universe. Imposed subjectivity is a contempt for those requirements.

Persons who impose subjectivity are as incapable of functioning constructively as they are incapable of understanding proper social interactions. So they rapidly destroy their exploits, while someone else has to solve problems through rationality. Rationality is applying objective realities to solving problems.


Article On Oppressive Education


 
The March To Fascism

Why Corruption

Corruption Is An Ethic

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is

 
Detailed Pages    Detailed Pages      TOP     

     top     

 

Home Page
Moral Philosophy
Political Philosophy
The Sociology Of Corruption
News Pages
 Home Page 
 Moral Philosophy 
 Political Philosophy 
 Sociology 
 News Pages