atrium    
 
  The Sociology Of Corruption   wine glass     
   

Home
Sociology
Science Errors  
 
 
 
53   ▼▼▼

Why Human Degradation

 
May 5, 2022

Problems are easier to prevent than to solve. Conservatives do not allow preventative measures, while they create problems under the guise of fixing something. Fixing is supposedly so easy that no rationality is needed in the process, while everything withing a wide radius must be destroyed for the fixing.

But don't they pay the same price as everyone else? Not where there are conspiracies. Conspirators assume they are immune to the consequences of their destructivity.

Conspirators assume they can deal with problems easier than others can; and therefore, human degradation gives them advantages over others. Obviously, there is an underlying problem that conspirators have in assuming they need to prevail over other persons.

All corruption starts with the assumption that if a person could prevail over others, it would solve his problems. There are problems preceding that assumption, but they are not corruptions until the assumption to prevail exists. In other words, people can find constructive methods of solving their problems, but corruptors find destructive methods which start with prevailing, which is the same as domination.

Conspiracies are necessary to prevail with corruption, because a lot of force is required, and the power of numbers is the primary method of overwhelming opposition for corrupters. That means that destructive purposes exist before conspiracies are created; so the products of conspiracies are always destructive.

Conspiracies create an immense advantage over individuals when imposing corruptions upon persons. Conspirators prefer to pick off their enemies one at a time, which guarantees their success. They take over social structures and convert them into power structures by subduing opponents one at a time.

Combining power structures with conspiracies controlling them causes corrupters to feel invincible. They don't realize how vulnerable they are; so they create problems for other persons on a large scale, which includes all forms of human degradation.

Socially, that process was a transitional state during the later half of the twentieth century. Conspirators taking over the social structures as a source of power was a slow and methodical process. What happened as a result, is that the conspirators ended up with more complexities that they could handle. Subduing opponents did nothing to increase their ability to handle complex realities. Their inability to handle complexities is resulting in social problems that can't be resolved.

An example is Trump's assumption that you have to beat up opponents to get a better deal. He (the conservatives) rewrote the trade agreements assuming he could get a better deal by beating up opponents. What that meant was creating stifling tariffs on French wine, while forcing Europeans to finance NATO. Everyone held their breath until Democrats could try to undo some of the damage.

It's the same motive for conservatives opposing measures to limit the virus pandemic by not wearing masks. They actually assume that making the pandemic worse gives them an advantage over more vulnerable persons—that is, with the assumption that the Corona virus is just like the flu or some trivial disease that comes and goes.

It's the same motive for conservatives dumping pollutants into the environment. They assume the vulnerable persons will be more affected than themselves.

Pollution and health problems are far easier to prevent than to cope with after they exist. But conspirators do not want to prevent problems, because they assume problems give them an advantage over other persons.

 
The March To Fascism

Corruption Is An Ethic

How Power Mongering Works

What Corruption Is

 
    Sociology      TOP     

    top  

 

Home Page
Moral Philosophy
Political Philosophy
News Pages
Science Errors
   Home Page   
   Moral Philosophy   
   Political Philosophy   
   News Pages   
   Science Errors