 |
|
 |
Lack of rationality, power mongering, superficiality and no criticism allowed are the reasons why problems are not being solved. Rationality requires explanation of claims and aligment upon objective reality. Instead, promotion of causes subjectively imposes force against force. Power mongering realigns relevance upon personal exploitation and domination at everyone else's expense. Superficiality is bitching about results with no concern for causes of and solutions to problems. Anyone who doesn't like it is screwed, as no criticism is allowed. Journalists (and organizations) allow no criticism, while they railroad fake science and fantasy technology onto society. Of course, they are not the source of the problem; they just report the news; they don't create the news. But the result is social ruin, which is not supposed to be the result of journalism. The claimed 97% of scientists agreeing is a power mongering claim, not rationality. Truth cannot be dictated—besides the obvious fraud of the number, which no one is allowed to correct. Any scientists who produce serious criticism is shoved out of science. So where does the 3% come from besides fakery? The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is not science. It is designed by politicians for political purposes with the result being dictated by politicians. The few scientists involved do no more than contrive scientific legitimacy where there is none. Any real scientists who get involved either quit in disgust or are kicked out for criticizing the process. Any who remain do not have enough respect for real science to be called real scientists. A few molecules of carbon dioxide in the air destroying the planet is so crazy that conservatives can see through it. Why can't greens? Because they are so absorbed in structuring green power that they brainwash themselves into believing absurdities. Even if carbon dioxide needed to be removed from the air, the fake technology for doing so adds more to the air, while exorbitant costs bankrupt everyone. Electricity is the most inefficient and wasteful form of energy there is. Electricity does not come out of a wall. It has to originate with other sources of energy. Right now, the sources are mostly fossil fuels. Why does the government subsidize electric vehicles when they put more carbon dioxide in the air than gas vehicles? Ninety percent of electrical energy is lost to heat before getting to consumers. That means 10 times as much pollution and waste as usual. Germany and England could not get past 15% renewables due to unreliability, and they had to resort to coal and nuclear. Australia (or some part of it) is producing 21% renewables, and they have unsolvable problems due to unreliability. The public is not being told such things, because journalism and organizations are railroading everyone into a pit of ruin.
|
 | ||||||||
 |
 |
 |
