August 28, 2022

Standards are proper alignments upon claims and purposes. Without standards, the results become nonsensical.

The most basic standard required is objectivity in social dialog, because subjectivity has no definable meaning and therefore no method of being corrected.

Conservatives are extremely subjective. A large part of what they do is promote values, which are totally subjective. Conservatives try to eliminate values which they don't like, which takes the form of racism, bigotry and a war against the lower classes.

The lack of standards by conservatives is highly visible and disgusting. Conservatives don't make sense. Yet their lack of standards is their ticket to success. That's because the demagoguery of fakery and quick fixes through corruption works best without standards, because standards create complexities which are difficult to handle.

Standards can be a viewpoint on corruption. The differences between corruption and constructivity reduce down to standards being either absent or applied.

One of the most obvious corruptions of conservatives is their accusations. They build themselves up by tearing others down. The big lie that the election was stolen from Trump is a known lie used to degrade Democrats and the basis for re-instituting Jim Crow laws as a supposed fix.

It's not proper or respectable to accuse. Satan is called "the accuser" in the Bible, because his only method of building himself up is to tear others down. So when conservatives do the same thing, it's not a proper standard.

One of the most rudimentary examples is that conservatives have historically called their opponents communists. The label is outdated now days, but it gets replaced by any number of similar degradations.

So looking at the name calling, such as labeling opponents communists, tells what is wrong with degenerate standards. The McCarthy era shows what it leads to.

Reagan fought a war against rice farmers in Nicaragua saying they were communists. They didn't have a clue what communism was.

When the accuser tells us what someone else's character, motives or direction is, there is no definable meaning. So there are no corrections. A lot of persons operate that way, but it only advances corruption, not rationality as the solution to problems.

It works for demagogues, because there is no defense. That makes demagogues look like winners. A lot of losers follow winners, while only corruption creates winners.

Rationality applied to the objective realities of the laws of the universe is a disconnect of persons from the subject, which is neither winning or losing. In a long-term overview, rational persons might be winners, but corrupters never see the long term value of rationality. In fact, corrupters might feel the truth which evolves out of rationality, which puts them in opposition to rationality.

All forms of subjectivity are supposed to be removed from the general, social dialog, because there is no method of evaluating subjective concerns. Personal realities are way too complex for social dialog; and there is no relationship to solving problems involved. yet subjectivity is an element of the accusations which conservatives use as their bread-and-butter method of mongering power including winning elections.

Instead of getting personal and accusing opponents, politicians are supposed to be describing the solutions to problems. Name calling is the opposite. Anyone who would reduce their standards to name calling hasn't got a clue what constructivity is. Yet Trump does nothing but name-calling as his method of prevailing. Trump hires persons as great-great and fires them as morons.

Saying someone is wrong or doing something wrong is not an accusation, because there are actual results that can be verified. Even being wrong in criticizing is not accusing, because errors can be corrected for objective realities.

Subjectivity cannot be corrected, because there are no defining elements to determine one way or the other. Subjectivity is in the eye of the beholder. It might appear that someone either is or is not a communist; but what criterion is used? None. Just hate for someone is the basis.

The reason why corrupters are subjective is because they act out their whims without evaluation. The whims are always subjective without evaluation. Without evaluation, there is no clue of the difference between subjective and objective.

Conservatives harp on freedom as their central concern, because they fight a war against the universe trying to reduce existence to subjectivity. The universe always prevails, which causes conservatives to feel they need freedom—the freedom to defy the universe in promoting their corruption.

One of the recent results is to re-write election laws to make sure conservatives never lose another election. Twenty some states rewrote their election laws under the pretext of improving confidence in voting. Preventing the lower classes from voting is their concept of improving confidence in voting.

The lower classes often cannot vote, because they have to stand in line for hours and they can't take off that much time from work for voting. The upper classes take fifteen minutes to vote, which allows them to take off time from work.

To make the lower classes pay their way for voting is the same as only allowing persons who own a mule to vote. That's the way education works. The lower classes have to pay their way for education while working for slave labor wages, which reduces their schools to nonfunctionality.