February 1, 2022

The term anti-science is being used a lot in recent journalism; and unsurprisingly, the journalists usually get it backwards. Not the least reason is because journalists couldn't be more clueless on science, while they assume their assumptions represent the true science.

Of course, the most significant example is the supposed greenhouse effect which journalists imposed upon society. But similar effects are found in the journalism of the Corona virus pandemic.

With the greenhouse effect, the corruptness couldn't be clearer. Anyone disagreeing with the assumption of journalists that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas heating the planet is said to be anti-science, while there is no such thing.

The science is in five hundred years of evolved knowledge derived and applied as evidence. The corruption is based upon ignorant assumptions with no basis in significant evidence. The methodology is the defining difference, not the opinions.

Rational persons, in science and out, do not require anyone to rely upon their opinions. They explain, so people can decide for themselves. Corrupters never do. That's why the journalistic standard is corruption rather than a disagreement.

In the journalism of the Corona virus pandemic, the same standard is found. Journalists absolutize their quasi-scientific claims with the background assumption that they are saving mankind.

Absolutism is not the higher standard that corrupters assume. They revert to absolutism to absolve themselves of the demands of rationality. People can only respond to rationality, not absolutist claims, because the complex realities of life cannot be flushed down the drain so easily in the attempts to solve problems.

Specifically, journalists portray the vaccines as the answer to everything, which encourages people to go out and start partying again after getting vaccinated. As a result, the flare-ups follow a sociological pattern rather than a vaccination pattern.

Journalists assume that vaccination is an absolute result for producing immunity. The mRNA vaccines are extremely weak and incomplete in producing immunity. They have no chance of producing much cellular immunity being a very small particle and not going through the process of actual viral infections.

But to increase the absolutism, journalists keep working on a rationalization for the vaccines producing superior immunity to having had the infection. They don't have a clue that cellular immunity exists, while they try to rationalize vaccines as a complete solution.

Journalists will say getting the disease might not produce much immunity. The science is that no one will recover from a disease without immunity being the cause. Viruses don't run out of gas. They do what they do until the immune system prevents it.

Yet anti-science is being interpreted as opposition to the claims of journalists. Scientists are saying very little because of the wall of disinformation that results from any statements. So journalists find and misinterpret scientists who say what they want to hear. Journalists also find anything they want in studies by interpreting results for their purposes. So they go back and forth between unquestionable authority of misrepresented studies and lone-wolf scientists telling them what they want to hear.

The reason why it matters is because trash journalism is the determining influence over the deterioration of social standards which are leading to Nazism. Most persons have no other source of information than what their favorite journalists tell them. They should be evaluating evidence to determine the truth. Christ said to look and listen to acquire understanding and judge for yourselves what is right. Doing so everyone's social responsibility and the essence of science. It's also the only protection from social corruptions including the approaching Nazism.