August 3, 2022

It's impossible for spacecraft to navigate outside Earth's orbit, because there are no reference points in space. That means the claims of putting spacecraft on Mars are total fraud. And it is why the results that are shown to the public are sandbox level insults to rationality, such as tracks in dust.

In addition to the locating problem, control of motion is too limited with nothing but rockets to produce force. That means there would be constant overshoot and undershoot in attempts to control motion and position.

The public doesn't realize the nature of the problem. They are led to believe that going through space is like driving an automobile.

Shortly after a rocket sends a spacecraft upward, tumbling begins, because there is nothing to prevent it. What is tumbling in space? Nothing in space is going to lock onto the surface of the Earth to control its orientation and motion. Everything in space is in constant motion. Aligning the three dimensional motion of a spacecraft onto something is too demanding to be achieved.

For a satellite photographing the Earth, the task is reduced, because motion does not need to be totally stopped. With high speed photography, some motion simply takes several shots of nearby terrain, which is needed anyway.

But space telescopes cannot use high speed photography, because they need a lot of exposure time to gather small amounts of light. Earth telescopes typically use exposure times of two minutes, which requires extremely precise motors to remove the constant motion of Earth while focussing on one spot.

The claims of spacecraft operating in deep space are a measure of the degree of fakery in physics and the purposes in glamorizing corruption by incompetent power mongers.

To determine orientation and position in space the Earth and Sun are not reference points, because location could be anyplace around them covering millions of miles.

Star clusters cannot function as references in space, because background stars become highly visible destroying patterns. Star patterns would be totally different than they appear from Earth where there is little interference from background stars. And recognition of star clusters would require complex artificial intelligence, which has not been available to spacecraft. Most of the sky would need to be scanned and compared to reference images, which don't exist for deep space, while the images would be blurry due to motion when produced from space.

The problem isn't simply location but orientation. It would be impossible to determine what direction a spacecraft is pointed. At first, gyroscopes, and recently, accelerometers, determine direction. But even the slightest error results in disorientation after a few thousand miles of travel.

Without reference points, even the space telescopes cannot be aligned. It's not like surveying, where bench marks are located for position through triangulation. And spacecraft are constantly moving and changing positions which cannot be determined. Distances are as impossible to determine as angles.

When humans photograph long distances, they need to use tripods for stability, because the slightest motion creates blurriness at distances. There are no tripods in space, while the distances are millions and billions of miles. Stopping the motion thoroughly enough is impossible.

It means the space telescopes are nonfunctional. The recent claims for the James Webb telescope were ridiculous in claiming to accomplish so much in such a short time.

New telescopes on Earth would require a year or two to log in reference points and angles standardized to other telescopes. Controlled motion is needed with extreme precision, because everything moves constantly. Continuous-motion adjustments are needed to lock in motion while focussing on a fixed point, which isn't possible in space. Rockets on the side are nothing compared to arrays of precision motors with micro-adjustments. (Hit the rocket Sam; woops, we overshot twenty seconds ago.) Gyroscopes cannot be used for position stability, because gyroscopes wobble when forces act upon them.

The claim of increased resolution with infrared for the James Webb telescopes defies laws of physics, because the longer the wavelength, the lower the resolution. This problem is well-known in microbiology, were objects smaller than one micron cannot be resolved without shorter wavelengths than visible light. Electron microscopes are needed for higher resolution.

Yet the James Webb telescope uses longer wave radiation, which means in the infrared area. Infrared does not produce resolution as clear as visible light as shown with night vision. Yet the fake photos for the James Webb telescope supposedly show improved resolution. It means photos are being pulled out of a file from Earth telescopes and said to be from the James Webb telescope.

These problems would circumstantially be why the lens was said to be ground wrong on the Hubble telescope requiring a corrective lens to be added later. What probably happened is that the original photos were blurry due to motion which could not be corrected in space. With thousands of scientists locked onto the first images, the blurriness needed to be explained. So the pretense was an error in grinding the lens. It's impossible to make such an error. Everything in a spacecraft is verified many times over. After pretending to fix that problem, photos from Earth-based telescopes would have been used to fake the wonders of the Hubble telescope.

The recent claim of hitting an asteroid with a spacecraft was total fakery. There was no method of locating an asteroid 7 million miles away with a spacecraft. Radar signals would be too weak to locate objects over the distances required in space. The optical image was said to be visible for eight seconds before hitting the asteroid. Before that, the asteroid would have been impossible to locate. There was too much fakery and certainty in saying, come look at this result at 7 pm. Like maybe they had the film ready to go, before adding that much certainty to the propaganda.

The power mongers didn't miss it by just a little bit with their space fakery. Every element is absurd.