March 22, 2024

Corruption is so complex and chaotic that it is almost impossible to evaluate. Scientists can describe a lot about a whole tomato; but all they can say about a rotten tomato is that it is rotten. Yet corrupt physics is so significant in taking over the social order that it must be evaluated.

The overview is that energy and transportation systems are being destroy but assumed to being improved and saving mankind from carbon dioxide. Notice the and. Isn't there too much coincidental nicety in doing two heroic things simultaneously: improving energy and saving mankind from carbon dioxide? Why wasn't the marvelous energy produced long ago regardless of carbon dioxide? Why did it take carbon dioxide to improve energy and transportation systems? Only because corruption gets compounded infinitely being driven by motives rather than objective realities.

The extremeness of that point shows the nature of the effect. Know-nothings who don't have a clue what science or engineering are speak for scientists and engineers assuming they couldn't possibly be wrong. That absurdity indicates the nature of the whole problem. It shows that the end result has no relationship to the objective realities involved but is driven by motives which replace realities.

It takes a lot of deviation from normalcy and expected human standards to disconnect from objective reality so thoroughly and whimsically while being so dogmatic in imposing corruption.

Getting into the mechanics of the corruption must explain those absurdities. One element of the problem is the difficulty in determining what objective realities are at the starting points of where they are supposed to be determined scientifically. Then a secondary spin-off results in the alignment of contrived realities upon motives.

In 1686, Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz erroneously suggested a concept of energy which seemed to be correct but wasn't. The issue was argued about 150 years until physicists tried to directly measure the question by stirring water in a wooden bucket to determine the relationship between the force required and the heat produced in the water. They ran into many obstacles which prevented them from going further. But a non-physicists, James P. Joule, got involved and claimed to be successful in doing exactly what the physicists could not do.

The result was said to prove the assumption of Leibniz to be correct, while there was no theoretical relevance to the result that Joule claimed to have produced. First, it was impossible for Joule to get the results that he claimed, because so little heat would have been produced in one or two hours of stirring water that it would have dissipated into the environment as fast as it was produced.

Then there were two errors in theory which made the whole process meaningless. First, more than one data point was needed to prove anything, while only one data point could be produced by that experimental design. To measure something tells nothing about its source. Second, forces take two forms in experimental designs: elastic force and inelastic force. They cannot be separated in usual designs; and the ratios vary with each event. Only inelastic force heats stirred water, while elastic force acts upon the solids creating stress.

So the experiment for defining kinetic energy was based upon a contrived number unrelated to the theoretical meaning. Yet physicists pretend to this day that Joule proved what kinetic energy is and pretend to be refining the measurement.

Do not physicists know that such an experiment will not prove what they claim to be proving? Picking apart that question is the essence of the task in evaluating corruptions in science.

The first problem is that each corrupter has somewhat different realities, attitudes, values and motives. The absence of alignment upon objective reality gives such persons common purposes in finding short-cut solutions to their problems.

Realities and results can only be universal (the same for everyone) when aligned upon the objective realities of the universe which define life and solutions to problems. Science is supposed to have the purpose of aligning upon the laws of the universe.

The problem that physicists ran into is that physics questions are so abstract that incompetents cannot grasp the abstractions. That means they are disconnected from the objective realities. So they pick realities as assumptions for convenience and assume the result must be infallible truth. Truth becomes a lot more infallible and dogmatically imposed when it is imaginary rather than aligned upon the complexities of the laws of the universe.

Then there are endless social consequences to such errors. The errors get exploited as a source of power for incompetents. Real truth places demands upon corrupters which they cannot meet. Fakery frees them from the demands, as there is no wrong way to screw something up. The bliss convinces incompetents that they are superior persons in producing magical results, while rational persons are absorbed in complexities.

And the rest is history, which means fakery is built upon fakery, all the while convincing incompetent corrupters that they are the answer to everything. They acquire the power to overwhelm through fraud. "On par with coal" and "carbon free" couldn't be bigger frauds; but they are dogmatically imposed by know-nothings, because fraud is a source of power, while it must be disconnected from objective reality to put power into the hands of incompetents.