 |
|
 |
Recycling Fraud March 2, 2022
The cost of recycling is vastly greater than to use original sources. In the expense of recycling is endless pollution and waste of resources. The amount of social force behind such purposes as recycling is a measure of the destructivity. The simple reason is because power mongers only get behind perversions, while they make every attempt to prevent real constructivity from happening. That dynamic is so prevalent that you can judge the validity of social forces by their success or lack of success in permeating social concerns. Constructive persons have to find their own financing for their results, while fraud results such as recycling are financed by a social tsunami that comes out of nowhere. Real scientists were ignored and shoved out of science for attempting to correct errors in fake science and technology because of that social dynamic. After power mongers succeed in promoting frauds, the stated justification is consensus representing truth. The science is said to be settled, because no one is allowed to criticize. Very little plastic can be recycled; yet most of it is supposed to be recycled. Where does it go when it can't be recycled? Into the oceans, of course. How else could there be several garbage patches thousands of miles across in the oceans? Fake journalists describe the source as washing off someone's driveway. That's like saying the deserts are made of left-over sand from sandboxes. Before recycle plastic is shipped, it is chopped into small pieces, so it will pack into shipping containers. After it gets to foreign countries, it is almost always hauled out into the oceans and dumped. Tax payers pay for the huge expense under the pretense of saving the environment. Someone will always do what they get paid to do no matter how fraudulent. To counter potential criticism, rationalizers of the fraud complain about garbage dumps while pretending that recycling fixes (at least in part) that problem. It would cost nothing to put the plastic in garbage dumps compared to dumping it in the oceans. So why dump it in the oceans? Because power mongers hate life. They don't want anyone to be any better off than they are. The material that is recycled, including paper, is extremely damaging to environments, as it take vast amounts of chemicals to remove unwanted chemicals from recycled material. Afterwards, what is the paper worth? The paper fibers are so short after recycling that they do not produce suitable material for most purposes. There is no shortage of small trees that can be used for paper. European countries buy wood from the U.S. for producing electricity pretending to be reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Getting the science wrong is not an irrelevancy. Cut-down forests can be, and often are, replanted. The regrowth is harvested small for paper production. The supply would be unlimited with replanting and good for the environment. But the resources are channeled into recycling, while cut forests are ignored rather than replanted.
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
