August 8, 2022

Power mongers are screwed up in the head. They have a quirky relationship to society. And they believe in it. It's a religion to them which gives them a resilience that does not respond to opposition or laws.

The reason why is because their power depends upon that religion. So the subject starts with the nature of power. Technically, power is the ability to influence; but there are a lot of different ways to go about it. There are justifiable ways to influence and destructively intolerable ways to influence. Guess where power mongers fit on the scale.

Mongering power is the process of overwhelming other persons to prevail against them. Corrupters assume that if they could prevail against other persons it would solve their problems. Prevailing means degrading to get other persons below their feet. Since corrupters fail at improving themselves, they can only be better than others by degrading others.

After corrupters acquire power, they are convinced that power is the answer to everything; and therefore the requirements for acquiring power and using power to prevail must be the highest purposes in life. Destructivity as the highest purpose in life is what screws up their heads and makes them a threat to existence.

Assuming power and the mongering of power to be the highest state of existing, there is a lot of follow-up in promoting everything related to the sociology of the process. In fact, corrupters must dedicate their lives to the process. They have no choice about it, because they are trying to defy the universe and its laws, besides human laws, with no ability to succeed. Failing in the attempt overwhelms them and results in a lot of determination and social destructivity.

The most noticeable social effect is a war against the lower classes. There is no visible logic for the war against the lower classes, even though the result is extreme, dramatic, visible and undeniable. Yet it is framed in political terms which are all over the map having no basis in reality.

The sociology of mongering power, being primarily carried out as a war against the lower classes or anyone who is vulnerable, is designed to eradicate any sociology which is not directed toward mongering power. That means attempts to survive or solve problems are assumed to be detrimental to society and in need of being eradicated.

That ethic is reinforced by a biological phenomenon called "survival of the fittest." Supposedly, evolution moves forward through survival of the fittest; and therefore, sociology must move forward through survival of the fittest. The fittest surviving is interpreted to mean destroying the misfits. The misfits are assumed to be the losers and vulnerable persons at the bottom of society.

The ethic seems so logical to corrupters that the erroneous assumptions need to be pointed out. The first error is the assumption that prevailing through destructivity is a proper representation of the fittest. Fit for what? Destroying other persons by defying the laws of the universe which define life? Power mongers certainly are not fit for solving problems or producing constructive results, which is why they resort to destructivity as the answer to their problems.

Corrupters also err in assuming their destructive methods produce a social order and its products. They don't have a clue where products come from or how they are produced. Exploitation causes them to assume that destructive means are the source of products. They are too stupid to understand the difference between stealing and producing. So they rob everyone blind and assume they are the source of everything.

Shallow Surface Realities

The reality of corrupters is too shallow to have definable meaning, which results in absurdities. The meaning of any reality is determined by related realities. But when realities are too superficial, there are no related realities to create meaning. As a result, meaning is aligned upon motives, which is always absurd.

With the "big lie" of the 2020 election being stolen from Trump, conservatives came to the surface with absurdities which seem too preposterous. How could they not know that they are disgracing themselves with such absurdities? They lack awareness due to the superficiality of their realities.

It's like finding a piece of metal at Roswell, New Mexico and trying to figure out what sort of spacecraft it was on. Without the rest of the spacecraft, there is no way of knowing.

Since corrupters have no way of knowing what the surrounding realities are for any complex subject, they want the result to align upon their motives instead of their enemies' motives. When their enemies say the surrounding realities are fraud, corrupters counter it by saying their enemies are producing fraud.

In fact, it's worse that than. Since corruption is a conflict with the universe, the objective realities are always condemning corrupters. But corrupters have their corruption rationalized and assume they are superior persons. So they need absurd realities which outweigh the objective realities which condemn them. That means they need absurdities to promote their motives; and they have no way of knowing how absurd their realities are.