May 5, 2022

Musk isn't just solving his own problems in buying up Twitter for $44 billion; he is trying to redesign social standards; and he says so. He claims to be improving freedom of speech.

It takes more than quips to improve freedom of speech. It can't be done through Twitter, let alone the infantile quips that Musk produces.

Freedom of speech is one of the great philosophical challenges of the past several centuries. That means it takes a lot of rationality to deal with the problem properly. Musk is totally incapable of producing the necessary rationality. So he has no business meddling in people's freedom of speech.

The first requirement for improving such abstract demands as freedom of speech is open and accountable clarification of all elements of the problem. That's not how Twitter has been controlled or how Musk describes the task.

The task requires stabilized descriptions with clear and simple rules that can be evaluated. Then when problems develop, improvements can be made by starting with the defined conditions and modifying them. Unless there is a highly definable starting point, there is no method of making improvements. Musk's quips aren't a definable starting point for improvements.

All constructivity evolves through gradual improvement, which requires rationality. Corrupters don't know that. They think they can originate solutions from their superior intelligence.

It's standard operating procedure for corrupters to dribble their virtues into existence in their attempts to avoid accountability for their incompetence and corruptness. Their pretense is that the highest standard is to produce everything from a dark pit which only they understand and lesser persons get wrong—in other words, the opposite of the openness and accountability needed for rational solutions to problems.

Corrupters assume their power and money gives them a right to impose their decadence onto everyone else.

Twitter is not a suitable medium for producing freedom of speech due to its highly restricted length limits. Its extremely restricted nature results in nothing but impositions from power mongers with no ability to produce rationality on the subject matter.

What Musk and the conservatives are talking about is who is allowed to use the platform, not how to produce freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech in terms of who is allowed onto social media is one of the issues conservatives have been harping on in their attempts to take back control over government. Yet they are blocking numerous books as being opposed to their values. Their freedom of speech is not anyone else's freedom of speech.

Conservatives are trying to impose their values through fraudulent government. Their version of government is fraudulent because they don't allow lower class persons to vote. The number one tactic that overrides their fraudulent claims of improvement in voting is that they create such long lines for the lower classes that the victims can't take that much time for various reasons. Conservatives don't create that obstacle for the upper classes, which walk in and out without delays—as if pennies must be saved by restricting voting in determining how four trillion dollars of government money is to be spent each year—the fakery of frauds. Conservatives had three trillion dollars to burn on corporations which didn't have the slightest use for it but not pennies for adequate voting processes.

What Musk shows in saying he is switching from being a Democrat to a Republican is that persons who get snowed by the complexities of their concerns go running in the conservative direction. Conservatives try to create an alternative to evaluation of complexities. But there isn't an alternative to complexities. So conservatives try to replace valid procedures with corrupt procedures trying to eliminate complexities from their concerns.

The absence of complexities in the conservative agenda results in values being promoted instead of laws, which results in a subsequent contempt for laws and the fascism that Trump demonstrated.