March 23, 2024

Conservatives promote a philosophy or ethic which says they can solve their problems through corruption—meaning corruption is not corruption but the answer to everything. So there are two parts to the fallacy of their erroneous assumptions. Part one is that corruption is objectively corruption, not someone's misinterpretation of the laws of existence. Part two is that problems cannot be solved through corruption.

Corruption is that which destroys life. Corrupters disagree, even though they assume their enemies are corrupt. Contradictions are an inseparable part of corruption, because conflict with objective reality is a major part of corruption.

In disagreeing with such statements, corrupters are simply changing words, not describing results. Their deeds are based upon corruption as the solution to their problems, while the words mean nothing to them.

The universe means one verse. That means unified reality. The objective realties of the universe define life and solutions to problems. That means problems don't get solved in conflict with the laws of the universe.

Of course, corrupters including conservatives don't know that and disagree with it. It means they disagree with five hundred years of evolved scientific knowledge, which they half-way know but show no respect for science. They have a disconnected relationship to science and similar objective realities, which means they couldn't care less what its purpose is, because they supposedly find the answer to their problems elsewhere.

Their answer to problems is being winners. Is being winners doing something definable? They don't know, because they do not evaluate. There is no such thing as evaluating when disconnected from objective reality. Instead of evaluating, they find through experience that being winners solves their problems.

So their errors are based on their concept of what winning means in supposedly solving their problems. They determine what winning is by feel, not analysis. They simply want to be winners and assume what they want must be an inseparable law of existence and therefore the solutions to their problems.

But they don't have conscious awareness of what solving problems means. In fact, everything in that area, they associate with their enemies—the lower classes. They have no concern for anything other than being winners regardless of how their enemies define the subject.

To understand what all of that means, it's the same thing as criminality with less awareness of consequences. Criminals try to gain something from crime; but they have some concept of why it is against the law. Only the most extreme acts of destructivity can be codified into criminal laws; so the extremeness of criminality is easier to conceptualize than the philosophy of constructivity. But criminality and winning are the same things in the vagaries of the conservative concept of winning.

Why then are criminality and winning the same? Because it takes destructivity to be winners. Do conservatives know some other way to be winners? They don't know anything; they just do what pleases themselves. They don't study anything. They associate study with hippies, crazy or communists trying to overthrow power due to jealousy and being losers.

Are scientists hippies, crazies, communist losers? It depends upon what they are doing. If they are studying realities, they are losers, in the view of conservatives. If they are lying to acquire power, they are geniuses—even "stable geniuses," in Trump's terminology.

The reason why there needs to be so much verbiage in the matter is because it's like evaluating a rotten tomato. Scientists can describe a lot about a whole tomato, but all they can say about a rotten tomato is that it is rotten. Describing corruption is like trying to describe a rotten tomato.

We need to get back to the starting point. The question is, can conservatives solve their problems in contempt for objective realities and trying to be winners. Let's consider whether it is true that they are in contempt for objective realities.

Have you ever seen a conservative describe something? They sometimes blather, but never describe. They use quips, slogans, accusations and name calling, but never explanations. They like to go through history tweaking every point to orient it around their purposes (fighting a war against the lower classes and sympathizers.) But reviewing history is not explaining anything. It's adding twists to usual realities.

When conservatives say corporations burning tax dollars on stock buy-backs is good for the economy, what is the explanation? Any explaining would show what a criminal mockery the whole concept is.

When they then turn around and say, the budget must be balanced by taking pennies from the needy, are they really trying to balance the budget? Implicitly the budget still needs balancing after burning three trillion dollars on unexplained fraud. That's not explaining their purposes, the obvious reason being that they don't have an acceptable explanation for fighting a war against the lower classes through fraud and destructiveness.

The next question is, what's wrong with trying to be winners? One problem is the methodology. The purpose is to prevail over other persons as domination. Domination is the basis of all corruption, because no one can function constructively while being dominated. And domination requires all other elements of corruption. People must be degraded, exploited and oppressed to dominate them.

The motive is the attempt by incompetents to be winners, while they are nothing but losers where there is rationality. Rationality not only exposes them as incompetents, it generates the truth which defeats corrupters. When losing where there is rationality, corrupters assume that if they can prevail against other persons, it will solve their problems. The only problem they are trying to solve is to be winners by prevailing against other persons. It makes them three-second winners, while they lose in opposing the universe.

Is then it possible to be constructive in conflict with the objective realities of the universe? Or, is it possible for corrupters to solve their problems in conflict with the objective realities of the universe regardless of how the hippies, communists and crazies define constructivity?

The question is the same as, does fighting wars solve problems? Corrupters just love to fight wars as the solution to their problems. Wasn't WW-II the good war that solved their problems? Notice that it was the Nazis that created WW-II, and they lost. That means it was the defensive act that made the winners. The defenders did not design the war, they reacted to someone else's purposes. So the purpose of creating a war did not solve the problems of the corrupters.

At a more complex level of creating social problems which include lower-level wars, corrupters assume they are winners and solving their problems. Did the endless wars of Iraq and Afghanistan solve their problems? The designers, thousands of miles away, made a lot of money and stomped under a lot of their enemies. If truth never catches up to them, why not? Because the truth always catches up to them, unless they destroy everything in the process.

Corrupters don't mind living under conditions of endless wars with human degradation. They dominate society that way. But try to define that result as constructivity. Even if they assume constructivity is not a good thing, it shows that sin and ignorance are inseparable.

One of the things corrupters miss is that while they are tearing things down to be winners, someone else has to be solving problems, or there would be no social order including cafes and places to party, if their enemies weren't solving problems through constructivity based on real science and the objective realities of the universe which define life and solutions to problems.

Conservatives promote lawlessness in words and deeds, while the try to exploit Christianity which says sin is lawlessness. Reagan said, government is the problem, while the primary method of getting rid of government was so-called deregulation. Throwing out critical laws is a large part of the problem that created the fascism destroying the country.

Throwing out banking laws allowed the money supply to be siphoned out of the social order and horded by a few power mongers. They then redistribute the wealth through gambling casinos such as the stock market plus mechanisms such as "mergers and acquisitions."

An example of how shameless the criminality works is a fake merger said to be in the process of giving Trump $3.5 billion dollars for his worthless social medium which already lost $5 million. Why would investors want a worthless, money losing operation? Simply to channel resources into the pockets of a died in the wool Nazi trying to take over the world. Trump is more of a Nazi in basic character than Hitler (who he often quotes). Hitler gave actual speeches trying to convince someone of something, while Trump does nothing more than degrade opponents with name calling, which includes all vulnerable persons.

Conservatives openly and dramatically promote white racism. They are trying to impose the concept that the world belongs to them and no one else has a right to existence. They don't care what that means, because their purpose is to destroy all opponents and vulnerable persons through force and violence.

Conservatives also show their lawlessness in their attempts to impose their imagination in place of laws—in the courts and everywhere else. They actually assume everyone is supposed to live by their stupid assumptions with no consideration of what laws are, such as trying to impose the concept in the courts that an election was stolen from Trump without a shred of evidence.

Wild guessing replaces all concepts of law and evidence for conservatives. Maybe all conservatives are not the same on such matters; but they all go streaming to the same motives, unless they get shoved out of the process, as some have for not going along with the criminality.

It shows that conservatives expect all of human existence to emanate from forces that flow out from themselves with no concept of the realities involved. They mindlessly impose themselves. Anything other than that they attack as a threat to existence. Rationality, democracy and valid government laws are attacked as threats that need to be exterminated. The purpose and results are not definable. They simply flow mindlessly from the motives of conservatives. Mindlessly means sin and ignorance are inseparable.