July 16, 2021

Corrupters are not credible. Why don't they care? Because their purpose is not to be credible but to tear down reality.

The rational world is not properly relating to that result. They look at the reality element of non-credible realities. There is no reality element to non-credible realities. The whole purpose of non-credible realities is to strip reality from a subject.

Corrupters need to strip reality from their purposes, because their purposes are in conflict with reality. Without reality, it's the motive that prevails.

It's not proper or constructive to promote motives apart from realities, because motives are subjective; but aligning realities is a proper and constructive method of promoting motives.

It's like an application. If the objective realities line up properly, then a motive is constructive. Without the objective realities, it's like a crime in that motives are imposed without properly determining validity.

On top of that, the reason why corrupters strip realities from their motives is because their motives are not acceptable. There are no realities that would make their motives acceptable. So corruptors promote motives without realities.

But there is no such thing as an absence of realities. It would be like an ocean without water. So fake realities are used to replace real realities. The fake realities cannot be related to as realities; they have the purpose of removing the relevance of reality from a subject.

Corrupters ignore the fake realities that other corrupters promote and align upon the motives only. Doing that results in extreme lying. They don't care, because they have no respect for realities. Realities are an obstacle to the promotion of their motives and a condemnation for the results. So lies are the fix for that problem.

What this means is that the rational world needs to address the motives of corrupters instead of their lies. But it doesn't happen. Motives are too difficult to handle.

Strangely, there is an unspoken social ethic of never questioning motives. It's an offshoot of the ethic of never questioning morality. The reason that happened is because a lot of persons are not simply trying to end corruption but replace someone else's corruption with their own. Morality would condemn themselves along with their opponents.

That concern is almost invisible, but it creates a social force that is overlooked rather than dealt with. There is a tendency to ignore the corruptions of other persons and try to find common ground. The price of that standard is starting to show up as a total disintegration of social standards, as corrupters replace functional government with totalitarian fascism.