January 29, 2023

The focus of conservatives is on values. The word values is in almost every sentence that applies to them. Imposing values onto society is extremely perverse, but conservatives don't know the difference.

That's an extremely strange attitude; yet imposing it onto everyone is what conservatives assume the purpose of government should be. They are madly trying to redesign society around their values and purposes.

The whole existence of conservatives is about themselves and their problems. That's no way to run a government or to influence anything in society. People have as much right to their own values and concerns as conservatives do. Yet conservatives do not allow anything to exist that is not determined by themselves.

Corrupters have the purpose of changing everything. They don't know that they would need to change the laws of the universe; but they know they don't like the way society exists. There is no such thing as getting society the way they want it, because their destructivity leaves nothing functional for results.

The more corrupters succeed, the more problems they create for themselves. But they have no concept of cause-and-effect relationships; so they assume enemies rob them of their success and all they need to do is get rid of enemies to turn their destructivity into wonderous results.

In the political sphere, corrupters and conservatives are the same bunch. That's because the conservative cause drew in corrupters as like-minded persons promoting their cause of turning the social order into something they can exploit.

It shouldn't need to be said, but the purpose of government is to solve some of the broad-based problems of society, not to redesign the values and purposes of society. It might seem from the original documents that values are what was being described. However, getting to those results requires objective realities applied through rationality in solving the problems that get in the way of those values and purposes.

Doesn't it look like a fine distinction between promoting values and purposes and solving the problems that get in the way of those values and purposes? That seemingly slight difference is the essence of constructivity vs destructivity. Using direct (subjective) methods of doing things instead of proper methods is the difference between criminality and rationality. To not see that difference is to not see what's wrong with criminality.

In other words, there are right ways and wrong ways of doing things. Conservatives pick the wrong ways assuming that the end result is the only thing that matters and the most direct means of getting there should be promoted. That attitude is no different than going to a store, shooting the employees and stealing the merchandise. A more complex and demanding path is required for doing things in a rational and constructive manner.

But of course, the rational and constructive method of doing things doesn't get corrupters where they want to be, which is dominating exploiters. So they pick the path that gets destroyers where they want to be and assume the purpose of government should be to produce that result. It's a strange concept of government and politics.