June 8, 2021

Corrupters are worth nothing. Yet they pretend superiority. To dominate, they need status to prevail. So they fake their worth to acquire status.

What makes fakery relevant? This is the outflow of corrupters—what they look like. Why would anyone consider them to be relevant? Only because they make themselves relevant through force.

Corrupters need force and violence to make themselves relevant, while they are worth nothing—actually, less than nothing, since they are destructive.

But overwhelming force would be disconnected from everything else. So a mentality goes with it. (A mentality is a bunch of aligned realities for the purpose of determining meaning.)

In other words, corrupters try to create a morally superior position in their attempts to extend their influence over everything. A force is narrowly defined, but moral superiority is infinite.

That's why status is an important part of prevailing. It broadens the influence to include all realities, so the contradicting realities are negated.

Yet, there is nothing of worth in the process, while the purposes are destructive. The worthlessness and destructiveness of dominating is highly visible, while everyone is supposed to pretend some great value to it.

The pretendedness of corruption is highly visible. Yet corrupters expect everyone to pretend that the destructiveness is a state of superiority. Arguing and lying about details never changes the destructiveness of corruption.

There needs to be some relevance to the destructiveness being faked as superiority in corruption. Accountability at that level never gets produced socially. It should, but to prevent it from happening corrupters somehow managed to convince too many persons that there must never be a moral implication to criticism. No moral implication, no truth about corruption.

The reason why corrupters get by with it is because the morality is so basic that it covers all related examples, while too many persons have their own versions of corruption to protect. Corrupters in conflict with each other can never argue at the moral level without incriminating themselves.

Persons who are not trying to justify their own corruptness also have to go along with it, or they would isolate themselves from everyone else. There is a mechanism for handling that situation in the grab bag of tricks corrupters have. Anyone isolated is guilty of anything corrupters want to claim. Isolated persons are arrogant conspiracy theorists for putting themselves above everyone else.

Therefore, social criticism has to be taken up from the position of most persons, which eliminates moral implications in social level criticism; and corrupters get a free pass for being incredible fakes imposing destructivity onto everyone as a superior standard.

Of course, that image is what conservatives have acquired over several decades of shaping their cause for the purpose of prevailing by dominating. Conservatives don't look right. The fakery of their destructiveness is highly visible.

Conservatives have no other purpose than prevailing. It's all they ever talk about—themselves as a group prevailing. It's the only purpose they promote. Even if they mention specific issues, the subject matter never gets developed, as their focus lies elsewhere. They can write encyclopedias on any subject; and the purpose never changes from promoting themselves as a group prevailing. With that purpose, the subject matter disappears in trivia.