March 25, 2021

Corruption is a disconnect from or conflict with objective reality. It isn't accidental; it's an ethic.

There are two major consequences that corrupters don't account for. One, corruption is not only required, it's definitive. Two, conflict with rational persons is created resulting in enemies.

Disconnect from objective reality (reality) creates an alternative state of existence. It's incompatible with rational existence.

But corrupters assume their state is a superior state; and they are intolerant of the rational state due to the conflict. It's how they define their enemies.

Persons who evaluate social interactions can never quite fathom the enemy concept that corrupters are obsessed with. Why all the enemies and endless wars against them? This is why. Anyone imposing reality onto corrupters is an enemy by reaction.

It's not an evaluation process; it's a reaction. Corrupters are sensitized to reality. They see reality as a disease and threat—by reaction, not analysis. The reaction develops through continuous conflicts over time.

Some persons learn how to avoid stimulating that reaction, which facilitates social interactions. The lower classes couldn't avoid that reaction if they tried, because there is too much reality inherent in their problems, which is a large part of the reason why corrupters fight a war against the lower classes.

The unfathomable analysis would be easier to understand from the perspective of an altered state of existence, sort of like living on Mars and trying to do things on Earth. Or it's like trying to wash an automobile with a ten foot pole—too far away for proper results.

And yet, corrupters assume it is others who have the problem. The reason why is because the disconnected state is blissful—it's the bliss of ignorance—while contact with reality is demanding. What is simply demanding to rational persons is an impossibility to corrupters, at least after spending some time on Mars developing their conflicts with reality.

If this explanation appears made-up, one of their thinkers (pretty rare in their world) described it this way:

October 17, 2004, New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush:

The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."