March 9, 2021

A corruption starts at the desired end-result and works backwards to get there. When the end-result doesn't look right, it's that process.

Going back to rationalize an end-result is a rationalizing process. People are supposed to accept the rationalizing, while it never looks right. It can't look right, because the purpose is corrupt.

The degree of corruption determines how wild the end-result is. Even the most ridiculous result is supposed to be justified by a rationalization process. going back in time for rationalizing is supposed to strengthen the logic.

Imposing replaces rationality. It's a tell-tale sign of corruption. Corruption is always an attempt to contradict rationality.

One of the most striking examples in science is the claim that the atmosphere will be heated 1°C when the amount of carbon dioxide doubles. There is no such thing as a greenhouse effect, so the fake science is extremely obvious. But 1°C isn't very dramatic, so the claim is that it triples to 3°C due to increased water vapor, which is called a secondary effect.

There has to be evidence in science, so fake mathematics was used; and since mathematics is quite telling, it had to be so complex that the world's largest super computers were required. Thereby, no one can verify the math. The math is called "radiative transfer equations."

Of course, the most common example in politics is the conservative claim that they are stimulating the economy by having corporations burn tax dollars. The purpose is to get rid of tax dollars so they can't be used for social programs. Burning tax dollars doesn't stimulate the economy, but the fraud has been perpetrated many times since conservative took over the world in 1981.

Arguing the rationalizations doesn't work, because corrupters are rationalizers and they don't accept rational arguments. So the truth needs to be produced and the point of the fake end-result. The end-result corrupters promote is not tolerable or credible regardless of their infantile rationalizations.