December 5, 2020

One of the strangest forces in society is the conservative war against the lower classes. How are conservatives being harmed by the lower classes? They aren't.

The most noticeable fact about persons who oppose social programs is that it is none of their business. It applies to other persons. Social programs are designed to assist the needy, while the opponents are well-off bigots.

Since there is no excuse for sticking their nose in someone else's business, bigots pretend that saving taxpayer dollars is the purpose; but it never is. Trillions of tax dollars are squandered to prevent them from being used to provide social programs for the needy.

The second most noticeable fact is the absence of social responsibilities. Solving social problems is an essential part of keeping the social order functioning; but bigots are opposed to the whole purpose.

It happens because bigots are nonfunctional and need to evade responsibilities which expose their incompetence. Trying to solve problems would expose them for the worthless bums that they are. So they pretend that no one is supposed to be solving social problems.

Socialism can have numerous and varied meanings. No meaning for socialism is acceptable to bigots, because all versions of socialism say there are responsibilities involved. Bigots are trying to pretend that the whole concept of responsibilities is a destructive set of values. Supposedly, withdrawing into a selfish bubble is the highest state of existence.

Regardless of the superficial verbiage, the focus of bigots is the evil of meeting social responsibilities vs. the superior state of selfish withdraw from meeting social responsibilities. Bigots need irresponsibility to conceal their incompetent degeneracy.

The term welfare exposes the stupidity of oppressors. There has never been a welfare system in the U.S. besides Aid To Dependent Children, which ended in the 1990s. Food stamps create a small amount of social assistance but cost nothing in the framework of the trillions of dollars squandered on corporations and the rich.

The total absence of relevance shows that the war against the lower classes is a psychological aberration rather than a practical concern. Psychological forces develop in the minds of incompetent corrupters as reactions to forces which overwhelm them. Portraying psychological aberrations as social necessities characterizes conservatives.

That problem is a large part of why conservatives hate liberals. Liberals are trying to create social responsibilities in their attempts to solve their problems, while conservatives are extremely opposed to having responsibilities placed upon them. The result is that conservatives feel they must eradicate liberalism to get out from under social responsibilities.

What do conservatives do that is so valuable that they must run our lives, when they refuse to accept social responsibilities for solving problems? What they do is pretend away problems. Trickle down is an example. It says, if the rich are made richer, the poor benefit through trickle down of benefits. So conservatives supposedly get to the end point of making problems go away without accepting responsibilities for solving the problems. They get to end points through magic rather than problem-solving methods.