There hasn't been an iota of correct physics produced since Newton's laws were correctly produced in 1687. In 1686, Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz suggested the incorrect definition of kinetic energy, which was argued for 159 years, until Joule's experiment was fraudulently produced in 1845 and supposedly settled the argument on the side of the erroneous assumption.

During that time, some engineering principles were produced such as Ohm's law and Boyle's Law. Engineering is about the opposite of science in being perceivable and superficial, while science is abstract and basic.

Science extends basic knowledge into unknown areas. Knowledge is an abstract human construct, which means nonperceivable.

Incompetents do not acquire abstract realities as basic knowledge. They use power to shortcut the demands of rationality. That means mongered power is in conflict with rationality, truth and knowledge.

Yet power mongers (and all corrupters) assume power is truth, knowledge and justice. They can't be told otherwise. They believe in their corruption, because it gets them where they want to be as dominating exploiters. Believing in their corruption, they are extremely self-righteous in imposing the frauds that they rely upon and dominating opponents.

The result is fake science and technology that incompetent power mongers rely upon to prevail over rationality.

Joule's Measurement

Joule's experiment was a fraud, because Joule didn't have the slightest ability to do what he claimed he did. He said he took care of environmental conditions by doing an extra run, which was absurd. His purpose would have required more than one data point, while the method would only produce one data point.

Joule's measurement supposedly determined the relationships between heat and kinetic energy. Energy is defined as that which is conserved through interactions. There were two alternatives for the definition of kinetic energy as Leibniz framed the argument. That means at least four data points were needed to compare rates for two alternatives.

Yet physicists pretend that Joule's experiment defined kinetic energy; and they continue to improve upon joule's result which said there are 4.2 Newton-meters per calorie and the latest measurement says 4.1868. Joule was supposedly only off by three parts per thousand—implicitly a wizard unlike any now days.

One of the problems with Joule-type measurements is that elastic force cannot be separated from inelastic force under experimental conditions. Elastic force accelerates mass and creates stress. Inelastic force creates heat. If a boat is rowed real hard and fast, elastic and inelastic force might be equal at about 50% each. If the oars are pulled real slow, the ratio might be 70% heat and 30% elastic force. Each time the oars are pulled, the ratio is different.

So how do physicists refine the number? There is no stated indication on the internet, but the indirect evidence indicates that they use electrical energy to heat water and measure the temperature. They relate electrical energy to heat rather than kinetic energy to heat and call it "the mechanical equivalent of heat." Doing that assumes electrical energy is an absolute.

Electrical energy is defined as amps times volts. Volts are defined in terms of force. There is no concept in physics of what force is beyond the result that it produces. And there is no method of quantitating force in transformations of energy due to the problem of separating elastic force from inelastic force. Which means starting with electrical energy is just as fraudulent as Joule's original experiment; and the entire subject is contrived.

Supposedly, the unknowns were all taken care of through some obscure nonsense. If so, why does the result align upon Joule's fraud? Only because frauds in physics start with the desired end point and produce fake methods of getting there, as shown with "radiative transfer equations."

The Leibniz argument stated that the prior assumption that the conserved quantity of motion (kinetic energy) is proportional to mass times velocity is incorrect and the result should be mass times velocity squared. I show simple and unquestionable mathematical proof that Leibniz was wrong and kinetic energy is proportional to mass times velocity (momentum), not mass times velocity squared. Yet physicists, to this day, claim Leibniz was correct and Joule's measurement was the proof that kinetic energy is proportional to mass times velocity squared.

Leibniz used falling objects to evaluate force times distance. He said, if a four kilogram object were dropped one meter, it would produce the same result as a one kilogram object dropped four meters. He used pre-calculus proportionalities to show the result. All he showed was that force times distance is proportional to mass times velocity squared for an accelerating mass, which is not a relevant question. He did not evaluate force times time, which is proportional to mass time velocity unsquared. The relationship between force times distance and mass times velocity squared doesn't say either one is kinetic energy.

Relativity

Building upon their invincibility with fraud, physicists contrived relativity as a control mechanism. It is used to test allegiance to fraud. It started with the Michelson-Morley experiment which attempted to determine if there is an etheric medium in space by comparing the velocity of light perpendicular to the motion of Earth to parallel to the motion of Earth.

No result was produced with the Mickelson-Morley experiment, which was interpreted to mean there is no etheric medium in space. That isn't science. There has to be a result to determine validity of the procedure and evaluate quantities.

Not the least reason why there was no result was because so-called interferometry was used. There is no such thing as interferometry, because light waves do not interfere with each other. Vision would be nonexistent, if light waves interfered with each other. Yet physicists pretend to be using interferometry for such things as gravity wave measurements, where motion is said to be measured at 100 million times smaller than the vibration of atoms—a total impossibility.

Since light is assumed to always have the same velocity, while sources vary in velocity, physicists said the velocity of light is determined by receiving points. That makes effect precede cause—an impossibility. Since receiving points are just as varied in velocity as emitting points, a rationalization was needed to get one velocity without variations. So physicists said the reference frame shifts for each measurement.

There is no validity in shifting reference frames for velocity. A universe would not be a universe without one reference frame for velocity, always. It would be like driving 70 miles per hour in a 60 mph zone and saying the car was only moving at 60 mph while the reference frame was moving at 10 mph.

There have been millions of lines of relativity equations written without a flaw, because there is no wrong way to screw up fakery, which is entirely why incompetents produce fraud. There is no wrong way to go about it.

But the whole significance of relativity is that it supposedly replaces Newton's laws and all analysis of motion when velocities are high; and no one in physics is allowed to say otherwise. So relativity is a test and tool for basing physics on fraud with no significant criticism being allowed.

Greenhouse Gas Fraud

It is said that when absorption of radiation by carbon dioxide was first measured in a laboratory, the assumption was that carbon dioxide absorbing radiation in the atmosphere must be heating the atmosphere. Every molecule in existence is absorbing and emitting radiation; yet they don't heat anything in doing that. So why would carbon dioxide in the atmosphere be different?

When physicists look at the absorption spectrum for planet Earth, they see a dip in the curve for carbon dioxide. The assumption is that the radiation absorbed by carbon dioxide does not escape the Earth and must be heating the atmosphere. It's the bottom-line proof that physicists end all arguments with.

All absorbed radiation is converted to heat in femtoseconds. Heat emits radiation at broad-band frequencies called black-body radiation or infrared radiation. So the radiation emitted by carbon dioxide becomes invisible when mixed with all of the rest of thermal radiation.

At 400 parts per million of the atmosphere, there is one carbon dioxide molecule in the atmosphere for every 2,500 air molecules. Dilute any effect by 2,500, and it rounds to zero for any usual purposes.

So the claim is that carbon dioxide traps heat. What is trapping heat in the atmosphere? No explanation other than absorbing radiation equals trapping heat. The air cools about 20 degrees on clear nights, which shows that heat does not get trapped in the atmosphere.

But the public is given a line of propaganda that says nothing but carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases heat the atmosphere. The incompetents put the quote below at the top of all state and local web sites on the subject saying that nothing heats the atmosphere but greenhouse gases. They missed the conduction, convection and evaporation that puts the real heat in the atmosphere. Missing that much simple science means they aren't getting anything else right either. Why didn't physicists correct such an absurdity? Because promoting fraud is what they are in the business of doing.

The quote says that the atmosphere is heated 33°C by greenhouse gases. That claim causes the public to assume that carbon dioxide is doing a lot of heating in the atmosphere; so increasing the carbon dioxide must be disastrous. They don't know that conduction, convection and evaporation put that heat into the atmosphere.

The quote is this:

The "greenhouse effect" refers to the natural phenomenon that keeps the Earth in a temperature range that allows life to flourish. The sun's enormous energy warms the Earth's surface and its atmosphere. As this energy radiates back toward space as heat, a portion is absorbed by a delicate balance of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere —among them carbon dioxide and methane—which creates an insulating layer. With the temperature control of the greenhouse effect, the Earth has an average surface temperature of 59°F (15°C). Without it, the average surface temperature would be 0°F (-18°C),---

Scientists have concluded that human activities are contributing to global warming by adding large amounts of heat-trapping gases to the atmosphere.---we release carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases into the air.

Fake Technology

Physicists try to glamorize fakery in their need to convince the public that their incompetence is magic and wizardry. Fake gravity wave measurements were designed for that purpose. Motion was supposedly measured at 100 million times smaller than the vibration of molecules. That's like measuring one inch with a ruler that vibrates between Chicago and Los Angeles.

Why didn't they try to be more credible, like saying one micron instead of one tenth of an attometer? Apparently, they didn't want any arguments from scientists. Someone might have argued a micron, but all that can be said about one tenth of an attometer is that it is fraud, while the word fraud is not allowed in science or journalism.

To pretend to be measuring gravity waves, a tunnel was produced about a kilometer long for light waves to bounce back and forth in a vacuum to supposedly improve resolution of the measurement due to long distance. But the distance the light travels has nothing to do with accuracy of the measurement. The measurement supposedly determines offset between two waves caused by surface motion. Offset caused by wave delay would only run interference with the relevance.

What it shows is that the purpose was to use extreme complexity as an indication of wizardry. The cost was over a billion dollars with the extremely vacuumized tunnel, which means no one is going to be checking the result with something similar.

Fakery in space is used in a similar manner to project an image of wizardry in doing the impossible. It's impossible to navigate outside Earth's orbit, because there are no reference points in deep space. The Earth and Sun cannot be used as reference points, because location could be anywhere around them.

Neither orientation nor location can be determined without reference points in deep space. Spacecraft would eventually be rotating in all directions, which cannot be evaluated without reference points. It means there never would have been a spacecraft anywhere near Mars.

The arrogance of the fraud is shown by the claim of a helicopter on Mars, when there is only one percent as much atmosphere on Mars as Earth. No helicopter could function with so little atmosphere.

Space telescopes are also an impossibility. When humans photograph long distance, a tripod is needed, because motion causes blurriness at distances. That's at a few hundred feet. What about light years?

Ground-based telescopes would be using layers of precision motors to stop the apparent motion of the Earth while it rotates. That demanding problem would be why very few countries have telescopes. Nothing resembling it can be accomplished in space. Gyroscopes cannot be used for stabilizing motion, because any force acting upon a gyroscope causes it to wobble.

It means the claimed photos from space telescopes would be pulled out of files for ground-based telescopes. By pretending that the images were produced in space, incompetent frauds can pretend to be doing something no one else can do.

With that much history of success in glamorizing fraud, replacing the energy and transportation systems with nonfunctional fraud was sure to be a winner. That's because functionality has nothing to do with it. Fakery can be based on any pretense.

With fakery that is visible to the public, fraud is based on futurism. History (rewritten) can be any failure, waste of resources and destruction of the environment, while the future is supposed to be the answer to everything. The future never exists and the past is irrelevant with futurism as fraud.

Destroying Energy And Transportation Systems

Energy systems are being dismantled before fake renewables replace them. Transportation systems are in plans for being dismantled with no possibility of electrifying them in the future.

What does anyone gain in doing that? Incompetent power mongers expect to go from one fraud to the next forever after—in part because they don't have a clue what they are doing and in part because they are only interested in the power, while the more the fraud, the easier the mongering of power.

Blackouts are supposed to be expected now days, supposedly because the dreaded carbon dioxide does that. There were no blackouts beyond power lines being downed in the past. Coal power is not affected by climate. That means the blackouts "prove" the fraud of so-called renewables.

Not only are blackouts overwhelming the public, the price increase in electricity is overwhelming. Yet investors are making money hand over fist with "cost plus contracts," while governments allow them to soak the rate-payers for the expense.

Rationalizations take endless forms, as always with fraud. The most disconnected persons assume renewables will always be there when fossil fuels are gone. Not quite. Wind and solar energy are so dilute that exorbitant contraptions are needed to concentrate the energy. In doing that, the available space is so limited that it is running out already.

So the conspirators assume that reducing energy and transportation to a few privileged persons (themselves) will carry technological existence into the forever. They miss the fact that chunks cannot be cut out of a technological society without everything collapsing.

The collapse of the modern world is already underway, both in economic and technology terms. No one can afford the incompetence, waste, fraud and abuse that power mongers are producing; and industrialists cannot keep the supply lines functioning with every element disintegrating including the metals running out, the junk not working properly and incompetents beating everyone up to get a better deal.