September 16, 2023

The rapidly changing state of society is not due to different ways of thinking by persons but by different types of persons taking over the realities of society. Those persons were not prevailing in the past. Now they prevail.

The nature of the problem is in how realities are handled. There is no possibility of constructivity resulting from the way realities are being handled by incompetent power mongers who are taking over the social structures.

The methodology of handling realities determines the results. Science, in its proper form, created a methodology for properly determining what objective reality is due to the demanding requirements for extending basic knowledge into unknown areas. Everyone is supposed to handling realities in a similar manner, which means correct science should provide the example of what proper and constructive methodology is for handling realities.

Science is making measurements as evidence for unknown realities and then interpreting that evidence on the basis of accumulated scientific knowledge. There is some disagreement over the accumulated knowledge of science; and therefore, clarifying the logic allows each scientist to question and evaluate the results independently.

At the social level, the only difference from science that should be occurring is that measurements are replaced by observations of social results. Then accumulated knowledge is applied to interpret the meaning of realities.

That methodology is rationality. It means evaluating all related realities to determine how realities align with the objective realities of the universe which define life and solutions to problems. Explaining claims is the most visible element of rationality.

But that is not what is happening on a broad social scale. The problem is not differences of opinions; the problem is improper methods of handling realities, which guarantees improper assumptions being imposed upon society.

There is no way to get realities aligned properly upon the objective realities of the universe with the prevailing methods of handling realities that are overwhelming society. Claims are imposed rather than explained. Explanations will always result in truth evolving forward through the interactions of realities. Explaining claims creates accountability and allows everyone to evaluate the correctness.

One of the major problems is that, with no explanation of claims, no one is allowed to evaluate for themselves; everyone must have someone else's version of reality imposed upon them. Imposing realities is a guaranty of the ruination of man.

There is never a justifiable reason to prevent anyone from evaluating imposed reality with openness and accountability. Wrongs can only be corrected when openness and accountability replace impositions in evaluating realities.

Wrongs are not being corrected in society because of unaccountable, unrecognizable sources of fake authority imposing realities. One-way communication in journalism is the usual method of eliminating open and accountable evaluation of imposed realities in society.

Supposedly science is the source of the imposed realities; but science doesn't work that way. The impositions are a fraud. Science does not impose realities; it explains realities. Yet the imposers explain nothing. They supposedly represent a version of reality which cannot be questioned.

Imposing a version of reality that cannot be questioned is the doom of mankind. Nothing constructive can result from that standard. Even if the imposers were correct, an evaluation process would be needed to align upon the realities. Eliminating evaluation from imposed realities always results in realities being in conflict with objective reality.

Realities are extremely complex and demanding in a complex society. That means realities can never be accidentally right. To eliminate evaluation from the process would be like throwing electronic parts into a pile and calling it a computer. The pieces have to fit together in exactly the right manner to get anything complex to work right.

What then is the basis for greenhouse gases, renewable energy, electric vehicles and self-driving? Supposedly some wizards have it all figured out for everyone else. Supposedly, scientists said so. It's irrelevant what some scientists said when there are no explanations allowing people to evaluate for themselves.

The real scientists have been disagreeing with the imposed conclusions; and they used to try to explain and criticize. But they were shoved out of the process if not out of science, while know-nothings imposed their claims onto society with no criticism being allowed.

The same thing happens in nonscientific areas such as politics, where absurdities are imposed onto society with no explanations, such as corporations burning tax dollars improving the economy or damaging the economy by increasing interest rates reducing inflation.

Realities imposed onto society through the media get more and more absurd day by day. No evaluation or criticism is allowed. That result keeps increasing as incompetent corrupters acquire more power and use that power to impose fraud onto society.

In that process, the imposed absurdities are an insult to human rationality. We don't have a right to properly produced realities. We are supposed to become a part of a Nazi scheme, because power mongers say so.

It's not a question of whose opinions prevail. No one's opinions are supposed to prevail. Imposition of realities is how Nazis and totalitarians take over society, not how problems are solved.

The persons imposing claims onto society are brainless know-nothings. They do not have a suitable background for their claims and do not use rational methods in imposing their claims. Not using constructive methods of handling realities is like trying to construct a building by listening to dogs barking. The barking dogs are an insult to human existence.

Supposedly, renewable energy is "on par with coal." End of subject. On par with coal means electricity costs ten times as much when 15% of the source is so-called renewables as solar or wind power.

Proper communication would require some explanation of how the expensive transmission lines are going to be produced. Every dollar spent puts some carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Yet electricity from windmills that cost $5-10 million dollars is supposedly carbon free. It's an insult to rational existence and a railroad job into totalitarian destruction of society.

The imposers assume they represent a superior standard and the explanations and logic called rationality create an inferior method which gets in the way. If so, what is the source of the superior wizardry and why can't it be explained? Anything real and constructive can be explained. Maybe lowly humans would not accept the explanation. But that assumption is not relevant, because proper logic will always prevail over improper logic. So why not tell us what the superior logic consists of? Because it doesn't exist.

Why the fake logic such as "on par with coal" and "carbon free," if logic is inferior? If correct logic is inadequate, why should trash logic be used? Because the supposed superiority is nothing but stupidity. The wizards can't produce correct logic, because they have no real knowledge.

What the frauds assume to be superiority is their own personal gratifications in mongering power to prevail over other persons. Since mongering power gets them where they want to be, they assume the process of mongering power is superior to producing knowledge and rationality. Power becomes truth, knowledge and justice for incompetent power mongers.

That assumption results from subjective motives replacing the requirements for producing constructive results. Constructivity requires the demanding tasks of producing knowledge and rationality. Simplicity for expediency replaces the demands of constructivity for mindless power mongers.