September 15, 2023

Incompetents have a path to success through a process of replicating, which is used to replace rationality. Replicating reduces complexities to simplicity. Simplicity sells well. It's an element of demagoguery. Simplicity looks like wizardry, while producing rationality is difficult and aligned upon demanding tasks.

Reagan said, if you need to explain, you are already of loser. He assumed the purpose in life is to be a winner and explaining is for fools. Explaining is the most visible element of rationality.

Rationality is the process of determining complex relationships between the realities which are relevant to a purpose. All related realities must be determined and evaluated, as missing relationships will create problems.

Eliminating the complexities of rationality as the path to success for incompetents results in going around problems instead of producing real solutions.

When problems are being avoided instead of solved, there is no wrong way to go about it. Whatever a person does to avoid solving problems generates irrelevancies at the social level where problems are supposed to be solved.

After sliding into irrelevance, incompetents need to look relevant. Replicating realities gets them there. Borrowed words, phrases and slogans can be made to look like the real thing. Word salad is the result. It gets incompetents through Ph.D. programs and in control of our lives.

That's what so-called artificial intelligence does. The new version of artificial intelligence scrapes the internet for words, phrases and slogans which are re-arranged to convince gullible fools that something is being said.

After forty some years of that standard being the "new normal" that Reaganites instituted, a second level of generating power through irrelevancy has taken form as fake causes or purposes. That means new solutions are generated for nonexistent problems.

Disconnecting from anything real is the basic requirement for incompetents becoming fixers. Fake solutions to non-existing problems gets them there.

But the larger question is why does anyone go along with it. The go-alongs see a path to success, not an end result that solves problems. Sycophants are looking to the fakes as models to emulate. The easier the path to success, the easier to do something similar.

Trump's popularity is not based on the problems which he solves but upon the amount of power he can produce by disconnecting from reality. Anyone can corrupt something; but getting by with it and generating power at the same time is the test of wizardry that corrupters are looking for. (To sin is human; to get by with it is divine.)

A problem that corrupters are up against is that rationality exposes them as the incompetent corrupters that they are. That means corrupters not only need to avoid rationality, they need to obliterate rationality.

Substitute realities and purposes are needed by corrupters to obliterate rationality. Substitutes replacing problem-solving processes eliminate the demands upon rationality that expose corrupters as incompetents.

Corrupters are focussed on themselves, as they replace social concerns for solving problems with their strife for power. The entire result and purpose is to put corrupters in control of our lives, while problems are created in society and other persons are prevented from solving the problems.

The tragedy is that corruption requires totalness. Any rationality that is not eliminated exposes corrupters as the incompetent destroyers that they are. The more successful corrupters are, the more conflict with rationality they create and the more total and determined they must be in eliminating opposition.

That's why corrupters do not allow criticism. They become highly vulnerable to criticism in generating fraud as their ticket to success.

The process of producing criticism is infallibly necessary and constructive, no matter how erroneous. It's the process that is needed for extending the evaluation element of rationality into all relevant questions.

Criticism is a process, not a conclusion. Opposing that process is always destructive. Corrupters condemn themselves in their opposition to criticism. That isn't to say that any method of attack is criticism. Criticism is a rationality process where explanations are used as the methodology.

If criticism were wrong, correcting it would move everything forward. The wronger criticism is, the easier it is to correct. So why oppose criticism? Only because corrupters cannot tolerate rationality exposing them as the frauds that they are.

The opposite of criticism is to insulate fraud realities from exposure to opponents. Fraud realities must be insulated from surrounding realities to be sustainable.

One-way communication is a common method of insulating fraud from criticism. Journalism is good for that, which is why know-nothings in journalism and organizations impose fake science and technology onto society with no criticism allowed.