Almost everything done with a computer now days is being called artificial intelligence. It used to be called computer programing. The most advanced elements were automation.

The net effect is another attempt to imagine super-human advancement into existence. Supposedly, the technologists are continuously on the verge of major breakthroughs.

It's an attempt to replace the incompetence of power mongers with glamorized achievements, which in turn is an attempt to portray corruption as virtue.

Incompetents actually believe their own propaganda. After lying to themselves a few times, their own lies transform into rock solid truths in their own minds. And the frauds grow in absurdity with each telling. The major frauds in science and technology show that result.

Where artificial intelligence is most extremely attempted is also where it is most in conflict with objective reality, which is self-driving. The bums actually expect to remove drivers from vehicles and send them through city streets. They can't evaluate a complex intersection, but supposedly, the computers will figure it out once they are fully developed.

Which is one of the frauds of artificial intelligence: the assumption that computers can be more intelligent than the humans who produce them.

The miss is a mile. Computers are constantly screwing up things that humans wouldn't get wrong, such as how to do a right turn at a crowded intersection.

The basic flaw in the claim of artificial intelligence is the assumption that intelligence is nothing more than retrieving information from memories. The attempt to produce that sort of intelligence shows up in the acquisition of endless data as the supposed solution to complex problems. Facial recognition is a visible example.

Human intelligence requires evaluation, which includes abstract thought based upon relationships between realities. Computers have no way of knowing what relationships are relevant.

Part of the problem is in determining significance. In fact, that problem often causes humans to make errors. Mistakes in judgement are almost always a part of human accidents.

Supposedly, computers won't make those errors. But they will always be worse at judgement than humans, because they have no way of properly guessing at significance in determining how to relate one reality to another.

Since supposed artificial intelligence is infinitely complex, rationalizers want to pretend it into fantasy land as a method of glamorizing their incompetent and corrupt existence as being superior and justified. Only objective reality can determine what is justified, not fantasy reality.

Fantasy justifications always have to be absurd; otherwise someone would be doing it right in an inconspicuous way instead of corrupters doing it wrong and in our faces.