July 11, 2023

Science brings out the bliss of ignorance in a way that is more total than anyone realizes. The bliss of ignorance means the less someone knows about a subject, the more they assume they know. The carbon dioxide fraud exists for no other reason. It is backed by the bliss of ignorance.

The manifestations are most visible in the correlation between perceptions of weather or climate and the cause being carbon dioxide. Most persons have heard that correlation is not causation; but that principle doesn't get applied to the carbon dioxide fraud.

Consider for example, that every analysis of unusual weather or climate includes a time span since the last time it occurred. Humans were not putting carbon dioxide in the air the last time the unusual events occurred.

So there must be some other cause than humans. But nothing ever changes, as that pattern gets repeated over and over in not only attributing the recent events to humans putting carbon dioxide in the air but using the events as proof that humans caused the problem and must fix the problem. It shows that the bliss of ignorance is unphased by evidence or logic.

Another manifestation of the bliss of ignorance is know-nothings imposing their assumptions onto society with no criticism allowed. Knowledgeable persons encourage criticism, because it is a method of doing corrections; but the blissfully ignorant do not allow criticism.

At first, there was an excuse. Supposedly, there wasn't enough time to properly evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide. But that was thirty years ago. A lot of evaluation could have been done in that amount of time; but the impositions of the blissfully ignorant have dogmatically increased over that time with less explanation or tolerance.

It says the scientific method means nothing to the blissfully ignorant, while society is dominated and controlled more and more by the blissfully ignorant.

And where are the assumed experts, such as the IPCC? Feeding the blissfully ignorant their garbage, such as guessing at the proportion of every weather or climate event being due to carbon dioxide.

The blissfully ignorant do not allow evidence to contradict their assumptions. This fact has become extremely apparent in the followers of Trump who cannot be told that all analysis and evaluation shows that an election was not stolen from Trump. It shows that the blissfully ignorant will not look at other sources of information that contradict their assumptions.

Sadly, both examples show that the blissfully ignorant prevail. When everyone visible on the left insists carbon dioxide assumptions cannot be questioned and everyone on the right insist their bigotry cannot be questioned, there is not much evidence of anything in between. The bliss if ignorance rules in replacing science and democracy with fraud.

Science evolved over five hundred years as the proper method of extending knowledge into unknown areas. It is now replaced by adherence to consensus. Consensus is how charlatanism flourished before being put in its place by science. Charlatanism is back.

How reliable are the solutions as renewable energy, electric vehicles, self-driving and going to Mars, when charlatanism replaces the scientific method? Those technologies imposed by the same blissfully ignorant persons could only be fraud, as all real science and engineering show.

The scientific method replaces opinions with measurements. It's not a question of whose opinions are correct in a science based society; it's a question of measured evidence. Only by eliminating measured evidence could the recent society deteriorate into charlatanism and fascism.

One element of the bliss of ignorance that is highly visible is the assumption that science is so simple and obvious that know-nothings have it all figured out. An earlier example was the attempt by creationists to out-science the scientists. They assumed they could prove the scientists wrong. So one of them, a previous government lawyer, wrote a book saying, yes, micro-evolution does exists, but macro-evolution does not. There is no difference between micro and macro evolution.

A supposed geologist reinforced the creationists' assumptions in saying, the fossil evidence of dinosaur could have been produce in a few hundred years, because rocks can form in a rapid manner. It shows that an expert can be found for any purpose. Science is not finding the right expert; it is producing measured evidence.

So frauds in science produced numbers for the effects of carbon dioxide saying the temperature of the globe will increase 1°C for each doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Numbers supposedly make it fact. But numbers are not measured evidence.

The method of producing the 1°C was to theorize complexities using the world's largest computers, so no one could reproduce the result. The atmosphere was viewed as many slices (How many was not stated.), then calculations were made of the radiation leaving each slice and the amount entering the slice above it. That's like scammers buying a pound of gold, cutting it into a thousand pieces and selling back two pounds of gold.

There is not enough knowledge, precision and accountability for the task. Radiation does not go from one slice to another. Some radiation goes directly into space, some goes a kilometer and some goes one meter. The variations are influenced by temperature, humidity and pollution in the atmosphere which cannot be evaluated.

When the frauds got to the top of the atmosphere, they said there is 3.7 watts per square meter less radiation leaving the Earth as entering from the sun, which is 0.3% of the sun's radiation; and that result causes the global temperature to increase.

But watts do not produce a fixed temperature. Watts are rate of energy increase. That's why people pay for watt-hours of electricity, not watts. But such contradictions could not be removed from the fake math, because there is no real math that does that and borrowed math produced watts.

Everything about that procedure is fraud. Most importantly, there is no such thing as effective disequilibrium in the atmosphere. Short-term disequilibrium is everywhere; but it always moves toward equilibrium. Equilibrium means the same amount enters and leaves on a long-term basis. The calculation states an over-all disequilibrium, which is an impossibility. And the claim is that the disequilibrium causes heat to be trapped in the atmosphere.

There is no such thing as trapping heat in the atmosphere. Absorbed radiation by carbon dioxide is re-emitted in 83 femtoseconds. The air often cools 20 degrees at nights, which shows heat does not get trapped in the atmosphere. Is there a different heat for carbon dioxide that gets trapped? All heat is interchanged constantly through conduction and convection; so it doesn't matter how heat gets into the atmosphere. Heat from radiation is no more trapped than heat from conduction and convection which enters the atmosphere from the surface of the Earth.

In other words, the fake numbers are not produce by scientific methodology. The scientific method requires strict standards that are verified and accountable including reproducibility.

The scientific method also requires developed knowledge applied to the process. Knowledge can be questioned, but the errors get worked out in the verification processes. Five hundred years of science has yielded a lot of basic knowledge with a high degree of certainty that scientists apply to their methodology; but it all is open to question. So measurements require the degree of reliability and reproducibility that show whether knowledge assumptions are correct.

Nonscientists usually fail to grasp the degree of complexity of science in assuming superficial assumptions must be correct. Not only do scientists study eight years of complex details at the universities, they educate themselves on specialized subjects through literature on previous measurements. Scientists study measurements. They are technologists and rudimentary engineers in accounting for every detail of complex methods. Do they do that for nothing, when know-nothings can pull their truth out of thin air and take over the social order with their ignorance?

If the know-nothings were conveying, they would have trouble getting the complexities of science properly represented. But they don't convey; they impose.