temperature graph   global Warming      
 Fudge Factor Replaces Science 
 Saturation Precludes 
Gary Novak

Global Warming Home

Alphabetical Page List

Trapping Heat

Dilution Factor

Underlying Science

Chatty Description

Temperature Effects

Equilibrium in Atmosphere

Radiative Transfer Equations

Fudge Factor


Greenhouse Gas Mathematics

Temperature Measurements

Recent History


Firing Scientists

Acid in the Oceans

Heinz Hug Measurement

Methane is Weaker

Changing Weather

Oceans not Rising

Heating 2,500°C

Natural Log Curve

Published not as Science

Fake Ice Core Data

Ice Melt Fraud

Future Ice Age

"Delicate Balance" Fraud

Heat-Trapping Gases

Back Radiation is Absurd

The Cause of Ice Ages and Present Climate


Second Climategate


The Disputed Area

Zone of Emission Fraud

Errors in Claims

IPCC Propaganda

The 30% Fraud

The 41% Fraud

The Water Vapor Fraud

Humidity Fraud

River, not Window

Hockey Stick Graph

CO2 Charlatanism

A Fake Mechanism

220x10-12 °C

Global Dynamic

Long Wave Infrared Radiation

What about Argo

Forcing Error

The Concept of Distance

Harry_Read_Me Files

Meaning of Hacked Files


A Look at Modeling 

Conduction Heat


How Scientists are Fired and Intimidated

External Example: TV Interview of Tim Ball

"If people knew just how deep and dark this conspiracy is — yes, conspiracy — they’d be amazed,” he explains. “More and more academics are standing up to refute climate-change theories, but it’s still dangerous to do so. It can mean the end of a career, the targeting of someone by well-organized fanatics.”

The ice-core man
Lawrence Solomon, Financial Post
Published: Friday, May 04, 2007

"...Because of the high importance of this realization, in 1994 Dr. Jaworowski, together with a team from the Norwegian Institute for Energy Technics, proposed a research project on the reliability of trace-gas determinations in the polar ice. The prospective sponsors of the research refused to fund it, claiming the research would be "immoral" if it served to undermine the foundations of climate research.

Notice that they are promoting religion and sociology.

"The refusal did not come as a surprise. Several years earlier, in a peer-reviewed article published by the Norwegian Polar Institute, Dr. Jaworowski criticized the methods by which CO2 levels were ascertained from ice cores, and cast doubt on the global-warming hypothesis...the institute nevertheless fired him to maintain its access to funding."


Bill Gray, a climatologist at Colorado State University:

"There's a lot of chicanery involved with pushing this global warming business," he said.

Gray, who has gained fame through his hurricane forecasts, says he has been a skeptic of global warming for two decades.

"We're persona non grata in a lot of circles," he said. "I've been told I'm no longer a credible scientist and I've lost grants ... I've had trouble getting papers published."


Professor Stott:
“There are many more scientists who think the way I do...But they don’t want to stick their heads above the parapet. They don’t want to lose their jobs.”

Professor Lennart Bengtsson: subjected to "McCarthy" style pressure from other scientists. "I have been put under such an enormous group pressure in recent days from all over the world that has become virtually unbearable to me. If this is going to continue I will be unable to conduct my normal work and will even start to worry about my health and safety."

Marine scientist Paul Ridd is censured for questioning photos used to show coral bleaching.

This mentality of science promoting and protecting some cause is the height of fraud. Science cannot promote and protect. It can only acquire evidence through measurement.

If there were such a thing as separating good science from bad, the carbon dioxide fraud would not exist, nor would relativity or the misdefinition of energy. But there is no place in science for separating good science from bad.

Science is a measurement business, not a political or religious business. There are no mechanisms in science for differentiating good values from bad. In fact, there are no mechanisms in science for separating good science from bad science. Each scientist determines the difference between good science and bad, and there is no agreement on the subject.

Truth evolves in science, or it doesn't exist. Truth cannot be arbitrated, and the only persons who try are corrupters who promote fraud.

Marc Morano, Climate Depot. U.S. Senate Minority Report. More than 1000 scientists dissent on global warming and get ostracized.

Culture of Corruption

Mitchell Taylor, Polar Bear Scientist

Recent Deteriorations in Science: Vox News Article, July 14, 2016